The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 2 of 2Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Science
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 2 of 2
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Patent medicines
| | | 6/21/16 | 3 | 1/4 | | of injection
----+---+---+------------+-------+------+---------------+--------------
11 | 30| ♀ | 6/11/16 | 1 | 20 |Considerable; |Considerable
| | | | |minims| not so much | pain and
| | | 6/12/16 | 2 | 20 | | tenderness on
| | | | |minims| | palpation
| | | | | | | over area
| | | 6/13/16 | 1 | 25 |Not much pain |Indurated area
| | | | |minims| | at pt. of
| | | | | | | each.
| | | | | | | Painful
| | | 6/14/16 | 1 | 25 |Not much pain |Slight indura-
| | | | |minims| | tion
----+---+---+------------+-------+------+---------------+--------------
* The diagnosis in Case 5 was primary syphilis, and in the other cases,
secondary syphilis.
† In this column, ♂ indicates male, and ♀ female. In no case did
Wassermann become negative.
The criticism may be raised that the number of cases and of injections
is too small to permit the drawing of any just conclusions. Even
should we grant it, the statistics certainly do not prove any marked
superiority of any one of the preparations over the others. We wish to
thank Dr. Sollmann for advising and directing us in this work, and Drs.
Bailey, Bernstein, Markus and Reycraft for assistance in carrying it
out.
Report of Dr. Albert Keidel
Twenty cases were chosen at random from the syphilitic patients
attending the clinic. They were given intramuscular injections of the
three solutions, in amounts varying from 1 to 2 c.c., at intervals (in
most instances) of two days. The injections were invariably made into
the gluteal muscles, at depths of from 2 to 2-1/2 inches, and ordinary
care exercised to preserve asepsis. After injection the patient was
allowed to depart, and the result was recorded at the succeeding
visit. The result was determined from the patient’s statement and our
examination. Some patients received injections of only one solution;
some were treated with first one and later with another, and one
patient received all three at different times. The solutions were never
mixed for a single injection, of course.
TABLE 2.--REACTIONS IN TWENTY CASES REPORTED BY DR. KEIDEL
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account