A circular which gives what is asserted to be the composition of Iodinized Emulsion, declares that, among other ingredients, each fluidram contains “one and three quarters m. Tincture of Iodine.” Both the statement on the label that the preparation contains “iodin” and the one in the circular that tincture of iodin is present in the product are incorrect, for the A. M. A. Chemical Laboratory reports that no free iodin could be detected in the preparation, and that it responded to tests for iodid instead. An advertising circular for Iodinized Emulsion (Scott) makes unwarranted claims for the therapeutic properties of the constituents. For example: “... the great usefulness of Turpentine in diseases, especially of the Intestinal Infection, such as the Meteorism and Tympanites of Typhoid.” And this absurdity: “... where Turpentine, Carbolic Acid or Iodine or even Pepsin is indicated, that it will give satisfaction in each and every case.” Iodinized Emulsion (Scott) is not a “pharmaceutical triumph”; it is an irrational mixture--a reminder of a decadent polypharmacy--sold under misleading and unwarranted claims. It is inadmissible to New and Nonofficial Remedies for conflict with Rules 1, 6, 8 and 10. Creosotonic (Scott) Creosotonic (Scott), advertised as a “reconstructive tonic” for the tuberculous, according to the label, contains in each fluidram: “Alcohol, m. 2-1/2; Creosote and Guaiacol sulphonates of each, gr. 1; Compound Hypophosphites, gr. 1 (including Quinine Hypophosphites, gr. 1/36 and Strychnine Hypophosphites, gr. 1/256), with Iodinized Emulsion (Scott) m. 30.” As in the case of Iodinized Emulsion (Scott), the advertising makes exaggerated therapeutic claims for the individual constituents of the preparation and for the heterogeneous mixture of guaiacol and creosote sulphonates, hypophosphites, quinin, strychnin, turpentine, phenol, iodin, “lactated pepsin,” etc. Thus, while it is well established that in guaiacol sulphonate and creosote sulphonate the phenolic constituent is bound so firmly that, when administered, but very little is split off in the organism, yet the advertising claims “that the system can be saturated in a shorter time and with smaller doses of creosote and guaiacol sulphonates than with any other form of these drugs” and that (on the false premise that the guaiacol and creosote from these drugs will permeate the tissues of the lungs) “they help to clear up the local infection and thus aid in returning to normal the diseased mucous membrane.” In the advertising pamphlet, following a discussion of the effect of climate and food in the treatment of the tuberculous, we read: