The Prose Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, Vol. 1 [of 2]Shelley, Percy Bysshe
General
The Prose Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, Vol. 1 [of 2]
Shelley, Percy Bysshe
English prose literature
The worship that a kind Being must love is that of a
simple affectionate heart, that shows its piety in good works, and not
in ceremonies, or confessions, or burials, or processions, or wonders.
Take care then that you are not led away. Doubt everything that leads
you not to charity, and think of the word “heretic” as a word which
some selfish knave invented for the ruin and misery of the world, to
answer his own paltry and narrow ambition. Do not inquire if a man
be a heretic, if he be a Quaker, a Jew, or a Heathen; but if he be a
virtuous man, if he loves liberty and truth, if he wish the happiness
and peace of human kind. If a man be ever so much a believer and love
not these things, he is a heartless hypocrite, a rascal, and a knave.
Despise and hate him as ye despise a tyrant and a villain. Oh, Ireland!
thou emerald of the ocean, whose sons are generous and brave, whose
daughters are honourable and frank and fair, thou art the isle on whose
green shores I have desired to see the standard of liberty erected--a
flag of fire--a beacon at which the world shall light the torch of
Freedom!
We will now examine the Protestant religion. Its origin is called the
Reformation. It was undertaken by some bigoted men who showed how
little they understood the spirit of reform by burning each other. You
will observe that these men burnt each other, indeed they universally
betrayed a taste for destroying, and vied with the chiefs of the
Roman Catholic religion in not only hating their enemies, but those
men who least of all were their enemies, or anybody’s enemies. Now do
the Protestants or do they not hold the same tenets as they did when
Calvin burnt Servetus? They swear that they do. We can have no better
proof. Then with what face can the Protestants object to Catholic
Emancipation on the plea that Catholics once were barbarous; when their
own establishment is liable to the very same objections, on the very
same grounds? I think this is a specimen of barefaced intoleration,
which I had hoped would not have disgraced this age; this age, which is
called the age of reason, of thought diffused, of virtue acknowledged,
and its principles fixed--oh! that it may be so. I have mentioned the
Catholic and Protestant religions more to show that any objection to
the toleration of the one forcibly applies to the non-permission of
the other, or rather to show that there is no reason why both might
not be tolerated; why every religion, every form of thinking might
not be tolerated. But why do I speak of _toleration_? This word seems
to mean that there is some merit in the person who tolerates: he has
this merit, if it be one, of refraining to do an evil act, but he will
share the merit with every other peaceable person who pursues his own
business, and does not hinder another of his rights. It is not a merit
to tolerate, but it is a crime to be intolerant: it is not a merit in
me that I sit quietly at home without murdering any one, but it is a
crime if I do so.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account