The Prose Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, Vol. 2 [of 2]Shelley, Percy Bysshe
General
The Prose Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, Vol. 2 [of 2]
Shelley, Percy Bysshe
English prose literature
“Observe and remember this concession. Tell me yet farther, whether
Love desires that of which it is the Love or not?”--“It desires it,
assuredly.”--“Whether possessing that which it desires and loves, or
not possessing it, does it desire and love?”--“Not possessing it, I
should imagine.”--“Observe now, whether it does not appear, that, of
necessity, desire desires that which it wants and does not possess,
and no longer desires that which it no longer wants: this appears
to me, Agathon, of necessity to be; how does it appear to you?”--“It
appears so to me also.”--“Would any one who was already illustrious,
desire to be illustrious; would any one already strong, desire to
be strong? From what has already been conceded, it follows that he
would not. If any one already strong, should desire to be strong; or
any one already swift, should desire to be swift; or any one already
healthy, should desire to be healthy, it must be concluded that they
still desired the advantages of which they already seemed possessed.
To destroy the foundation of this error, observe, Agathon, that each
of these persons must possess the several advantages in question, at
the moment present to our thoughts, whether he will or no. And, now, is
it possible that those advantages should be at that time the objects
of his desire? For, if any one should say, being in health, ‘I desire
to be in health;’ being rich, ‘I desire to be rich, and thus still
desire those things which I already possess;’ we might say to him,
‘You, my friend, possess health, and strength, and riches; you do not
desire to possess now, but to continue to possess them in future; for,
whether you will or no, they now belong to you. Consider then, whether,
when you say that you desire things present to you, and in your own
possession, you say anything else than that you desire the advantages
to be for the future also in your possession.’ What else could he
reply?”--“Nothing, indeed.”--“Is not Love, then, the love of that
which is not within its reach, and which cannot hold in security, for
the future, those things of which it obtains a present and transitory
possession?”--“Evidently.”--“Love, therefore, and everything else that
desires anything, desires that which is absent and beyond his reach,
that which it has not, that which is not itself, that which it wants;
such are the things of which there are desire and love?”--“Assuredly.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account