[124: That the _regnum Vannianum_ (Plin. _H. N._ iv. 12, 81), the Suebian state (Tacitus, _Ann._ xii. 29; _Hist._ iii. 5, 21), must be referred, not merely, as might appear from Tacitus, _Ann._ ii. 63, to the dwellings of the people that went over with Maroboduus and Catualda, but to the whole territory of the Marcomani and Quadi, is shown clearly by the second report, _Ann._ xii. 29, 30, since here, as opponents of Vannius alongside of his own insurgent subjects, there appear the peoples bordering on Bohemia to the west and north, the Hermunduri and Lugii. As boundary towards the east Pliny _l.c._ designates the region of Carnuntum (_Germanorum ibi confinium_) more exactly the river Marus or Duria, which separates the Suebi and the _regnum Vannianum_ from their eastern neighbours, whether we may refer the _dirimens eos_ with Müllenhoff (_Sitzungsberichte der Berliner Akademie_ 1883, p. 871) to the Jazyges, or, as is more natural, to the Bastarnae. In reality both doubtless bordered, the Jazyges on the south, the Bastarnae on the north, with the Quadi of the March valley. Accordingly the Marus is the March, and the demarcation is formed by the small Carpathians that stretch between the March and the Waag. If thus those retainers were settled _inter flumen Marum et Cusum_, then the Cusus not elsewhere mentioned is, provided the statement is correct, not the Waag, or even, as Müllenhoff supposed, the Eipel falling into the Danube below Gran, but an affluent of the Danube westward of the March, perhaps the Gusen near Linz. The narrative in Tacitus xii. 29, 30, also requires the territory of Vannius to have reached to the west even beyond the March. The subscription to the first book of the _Meditations_ of the emperor Marcus ἐν Κουάδοις πρὸς τῷ Γρανούᾳ, proves doubtless that then the state of the Quadi stretched as far as the river Gran; but this state is not coincident with the _regnum Vannianum_.] [125: _Regibus Bastarnarum et Roxolanorum filios, Dacorum fratrum captos aut hostibus ereptos remisit_ (Orelli, 750) is miswritten; it must run _fratres_, or at any rate _fratrum filios_. In like manner afterwards _per quae_ is to be read for _per quem_ and _rege_ instead of _regem_.]