The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
This natural condition has, as a rule, handed over the country to
shepherds and robbers. The necessarily nomadic character of a great
part of the population leads to endless feuds, particularly about
places of pasture, and to constant seizures of those regions which
are suited for fixed settlement; here, still more than elsewhere,
there is need for the formation of such political powers as are in a
position to procure quiet and peace on a wider scale, and for these
there is no right basis in the population. There is hardly a region
in the wide world in which, so much as in this case, civilisation has
not grown up spontaneously, but could only be called into existence by
the ascendency of conquest from without. When military stations hem in
the roving tribes of the desert and force those within the limit of
cultivation to a peaceful pastoral life, when colonists are conducted
to the regions capable of culture, and the waters of the mountains are
led by human hands into the plains, then, but only then, a cheerful and
plentiful life thrives in this region.
[Sidenote: Greek influence in eastern Syria.]
The pre-Roman period had not brought such blessings to these lands.
The inhabitants of the whole territory as far as Damascus belong to
the Arabian branch of the great Semitic stock; the names of persons
at least are throughout Arabic. In it, as in northern Syria, Oriental
and Occidental civilisation met; yet up to the time of the empire the
two had made but little progress. The language and the writing, which
the Nabataeans used, were those of Syria and of the Euphrates-lands,
and could only have come from thence to the natives. On the other hand
the Greek settlement in Syria extended itself, in part at least, also
to these regions. The great commercial town of Damascus had become
Greek with the rest of Syria. The Seleucids had carried the founding
of Greek towns even into the region beyond the Jordan, especially into
the northern Decapolis; further to the south at least the old Rabbath
Ammon had been converted by the Lagids into the city of Philadelphia.
But further away and in the eastern districts bordering on the desert
the Nabataean kings were not much more than nominally obedient to
the Syrian or Egyptian Alexandrids, and coins or inscriptions and
buildings, which might be attributed to pre-Roman Hellenism, have
nowhere come to light.
[Sidenote: Arrangements of Pompeius.]
When Syria became Roman, Pompeius exerted himself to strengthen the
Hellenic urban system, which he found in existence; as indeed the towns
of the Decapolis subsequently reckoned their years from the year 690-91
{64-63. B.C.}, in which Palestine had been added to the empire.[143]
But in this region the government as well as the civilisation continued
to be left to the two vassal-states, the Jewish and the Arabian.
[Sidenote: The territory of Herod beyond the Jordan.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account