The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
that we know--the Temple of Baalsamin at Canatha--bears an Aramaean
dedication, the honorary bases erected there, including one for Herod
the Great,[145] are bilingual or merely Greek; under his successors
Greek rules alone.
[Sidenote: The kingdom of Nabat.]
By the side of the Jewish kings stood the formerly-mentioned (iv. 140)
{iv. 134.} “king of Nabat,” as he called himself. The residence of
this Arabian prince was the city, known to us only by its Greek name
Petra, a rock-fastness situated midway between the Dead Sea and the
north-east extremity of the Arabian Gulf, from of old an emporium for
the traffic of India and Arabia with the region of the Mediterranean.
These rulers possessed the northern half of the Arabian peninsula;
their power extended on the Arabian Gulf as far as Leuce Come opposite
to the Egyptian town of Berenice, in the interior at least as far
as the region of the old Thaema.[146] To the north of the peninsula
their territory reached as far as Damascus, which was under their
protection,[147] and even beyond Damascus[148], and enclosed as with
a girdle the whole of Palestinian Syria. The Romans, after taking
possession of Judaea, came into hostile contact with them, and Marcus
Scaurus led an expedition against them. At that time their subjugation
was not accomplished; but it must have ensued soon afterwards.[149]
Under Augustus their king Obodas was just as subject to the empire[150]
as Herod the king of the Jews, and rendered, like the latter, military
service in the Roman expedition against southern Arabia. Since that
time the protection of the imperial frontier in the south as in the
east of Syria, as far up as to Damascus, must have lain mainly in
the hands of this Arabian king. With his Jewish neighbour he was at
constant feud. Augustus, indignant that the Arabian instead of seeking
justice at the hand of his suzerain against Herod, had encountered the
latter with arms, and that Obodas’s son, Harethath, or in Greek Aretas,
after the death of his father, instead of waiting for investiture, had
at once entered upon the dominion, was on the point of deposing the
latter and of joining his territory to the Jewish; but the misrule of
Herod in his later years withheld him from this step, and so Aretas was
confirmed (about 747 U.C.) {7 B.C.}. Some decades later he began again
warfare at his own hand against his son-in-law, the prince of Galilee,
Herod Antipas, on account of the divorce of his daughter in favour of
the beautiful Herodias. He retained the upper hand, but the indignant
suzerain Tiberius ordered the governor of Syria to proceed against
him. The troops were already on the march, when Tiberius died (37);
and his successor, Gaius, who did not wish well to Antipas, pardoned
the Arabian. King Maliku or Malchus, the successor of Aretas, fought
under Nero and Vespasian in the Jewish war as a Roman vassal, and
transmitted his dominion to his son Dabel, the contemporary of Trajan,
and the last of these rulers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account