The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
North Africa, in a physical and ethnographic point of view, stands by
itself like an island. Nature has isolated it on all sides, partly by
the Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea, partly by the widely-extended
shore, incapable of cultivation, of the Great Syrtis below the modern
Fezzan, and, in connection therewith, by the desert, likewise closed
against cultivation, which shuts off the steppe-land and the oases of
the Sahara to the south. Ethnographically the population of this wide
region forms a great family of peoples, distinguished most sharply
from the Blacks of the south, but likewise strictly separated from the
Egyptians, although perhaps with these there may once have subsisted
a primeval fellowship. They call themselves in the Riff near Tangier
Amâzigh, in the Sahara Imôshagh, and the same name meets us, referred
to particular tribes, on several occasions among the Greeks and Romans,
thus as Maxyes at the founding of Carthage (ii. 8) {ii. 7.}, as Mazices
in the Roman period at different places of the Mauretanian north
coast; the similar designation that has remained with the scattered
remnants proves that this great people has once had a consciousness,
and has permanently retained the impression, of the relationship of
its members. To the peoples who came into contact with them this
relationship was far from clear; the diversities which prevail among
their several parts are not merely at the present day glaring, after in
the past thousands of years the mixture with the neighbouring peoples,
particularly the Negroes in the south and the Arabs in the north,
has had its effect upon them, but certainly were as considerable even
before these foreign influences as their extension in space demands.
A universally valid expression for the nation as such is wanting in
all other idioms; even where the name goes beyond the designation of
stock,[275] it yet does not describe the circle as a whole. That of
Libyans, which the Egyptians, and after their precedent the Greeks use,
belongs originally to the most easterly tribes coming into contact
with Egypt, and has always remained specially pertaining to those of
the eastern half. That of Nomades, of Greek origin, expresses in the
first instance only the absence of settlement, and then in its Roman
transformation as Numidians, has become associated with that territory
which king Massinissa united under his sway. That of Mauri, of native
origin, and current among the later Greeks as well as the Romans, is
restricted to the western parts of the land, and continues in use for
the kingdoms here formed and the Roman provinces that have proceeded
from them. The tribes of the south are comprehended under the name of
the Gaetulians, which, however, the stricter use of language limits to
the region on the Atlantic Ocean to the south of Mauretania. We are
accustomed to designate the nation by the name of Berbers, which the
Arabs apply to the northern tribes.
[Sidenote: Type.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account