The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
How far the field of the Roman power went beyond the Roman towns and
garrisons and the end of the imperial roads, we are not able to say.
The broad steppe-land round the salt-lakes to the west of Lambaesis,
the mountain-region from Tlemsen till towards Fez, including the coast
of the Riff, the fine corn-country on the Atlantic Ocean southward
from Sala as far as the high Atlas, the civilisation of which in the
flourishing time of the Arabs vied with the Andalusian, lastly, the
Atlas range in the south of Algeria and Morocco and its southern
slopes, which afforded for pastoral people abundant provision in the
alternation of mountain and steppe pastures, and developed the most
luxuriant fertility in the numerous oases--all these regions remained
essentially untouched by the Roman civilisation; but from this it does
not follow that they were in the Roman time independent, and still
less that they were not at least reckoned as belonging to the imperial
domain. Tradition gives us but slight information in this respect. We
have already mentioned (p. 313) that the proconsuls of Africa helped to
make the Gaetulians--that is, the tribes in southern Algeria--subject
to king Juba; and the latter constructed purple dyeworks at Madeira
(p. 338, note). After the end of the Mauretanian dynasty and the
introduction of the immediate Roman administration, Suetonius Paullinus
crossed, as the first Roman general, the Atlas (p. 313), and carried
his arms as far as the desert-river Ger, which still bears the same
name, in the south-east of Morocco. His successor, Gnaeus Hosidius
Geta, continued this enterprise, and emphatically defeated the leader
of the Mauri Salabus. Subsequently several enterprising governors of
the Mauretanian provinces traversed these remote regions, and the
same holds true of the Numidian, under whose command, not under the
Mauretanian, was placed the frontier-range stretching southward behind
the province of Caesarea;[286] yet nothing is mentioned from later
times of war-expeditions proper in the south of Mauretania or Numidia.
The Romans can scarcely have taken over the empire of the Mauretanian
kings in quite the same extent as these had possessed it; but yet the
expeditions that were undertaken after the annexation of the country
were probably not without lasting consequences. At least a portion
of the Gaetulians submitted, as the auxiliary troops levied there
prove, even to the regular conscription during the imperial period;
and, if the native tribes in the south of the Roman provinces had
given serious trouble to the Romans, the traces of it would not have
been wholly wanting.[287] Probably the whole south as far as the great
desert passed as imperial land,[288] and even the effective dependence
extended far beyond the domain of Roman civilisation, which, it is
true, does not exclude frequent levying of contributions and pillaging
raids on the one side or the other.
[Sidenote: Incursions of the Moors into Spain.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account