The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
Oil, too, and wine had already held a prominent place in the old
Carthaginian husbandry, and on Little-Leptis (near Susa), for
example, an annual payment of 3,000,000 pounds of oil (nearly 10,000
hectolitres) could be imposed by Caesar for the Roman baths, as indeed
Susa still at the present day exports 40,000 hectolitres of oil.
Accordingly the historian of the Jugurthan war terms Africa rich in
corn, poor in oil and wine, and even in Vespasian’s time the province
gave in this respect only a moderate yield. It was only when the peace
with the empire became permanent--a peace which the fruit-tree needed
even far more than the fruits of the field--that the culture of olives
extended; in the fourth century no province supplied such quantities
of oil as Africa, and the African oil was predominantly employed for
the baths in Rome. In quality, doubtless, it was always inferior to
that of Italy and Spain, not because nature there was less favourable,
but because the preparation lacked skill and care. The cultivation of
the vine acquired no prominent importance in Africa for export. On the
other hand the breeding of horses and of cattle flourished, especially
in Numidia and Mauretania.
[Sidenote: Manufactures and commerce.]
Manufactures and trade never had the same importance in the African
provinces as in the East and in Egypt. The Phoenicians had transplanted
the preparation of purple from their native country to these coasts,
where the island of Gerba (Jerba) became the African Tyre, and was
inferior only to the latter itself in quality. This manufacture
flourished through the whole imperial period. Among the few deeds which
king Juba II. has to show, is the arrangement for obtaining purple
on the coast of the Atlantic Ocean and on the adjacent islands.[304]
Woollen stuffs of inferior quality and leather goods were manufactured
in Mauretania, apparently by the natives, also for export.[305] The
trade in slaves was very considerable. The products of the interior
of the country naturally passed by way of North Africa into general
commerce, but not to such an extent as by way of Egypt. The elephant,
it is true, was the device of Mauretania in particular, and there,
where it has now for long disappeared, it was still hunted down to the
imperial period; but probably only small quantities came thence into
commerce.
[Sidenote: Prosperity.]
The prosperity which subsisted in the part of Africa at all cultivated
is clearly attested by the ruins of its numerous towns, which, in
spite of the narrow bounds of their domains, everywhere exhibit baths,
theatres, triumphal arches, gorgeous tombs, and generally buildings
of luxury of all kinds, mostly mediocre in art, often excessive in
magnificence. Not quite in the villas of the superior nobility, as in
the Gallic land, but in the middle class of the farming burgesses must
the economic strength of these regions have lain.[306]
[Sidenote: Roads.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account