The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
[67] As the wars against the Arabians and the Adiabenians were in
fact directed against the Parthians, it was natural that the titles
_Parthicus_, _Arabicus_, and _Parthicus Adiabenicus_, should on that
account be conferred on the emperor; they are also so found, but
usually Parthicus is omitted, evidently because, as the biographer
of Severus says (c. 9), _excusavit Parthicum nomen, ne Parthos
lacesseret_. With this agrees the notice certainly belonging to the
year 195 in Dio, lxxv. 9, 6, as to the peaceful agreement with the
Parthians and the cession of a portion of Armenia to them.
[68] That Armenia also fell into their power is indicated by Herodian,
v. 9, 2; no doubt his representation is warped and defective.
[69] When at the peace in 218 the old relation between Rome and Armenia
was renewed, the king of Armenia gave himself the prospect of a renewal
of the Roman annual moneys (Dio, lxxviii. 27: τοῦ Τιριδάτου τὸ ἀργύριον
ὃ κατ’ ἔτος παρὰ τῶν Ῥωμαίων εὑρίσκετο ἐλπίσαντος λήψεσθαι). Payment
of tribute proper by the Romans to the Armenians is excluded for the
period of Severus and the time before Severus, and by no means agrees
with the words of Dio; the connection must be what we have indicated.
In the fourth and fifth centuries the fortress of Biriparach in the
Caucasus, which barred the Dariel pass, was maintained by the Persians,
who played the part of masters here after the peace of 364, with a
Roman contribution, and this was likewise conceived as payment of
tribute (Lydus, _de Mag._ iii. 52, 53; Priscus, _fr._ 31, Mull.).
[70] Artaxares names his father Papacus in the inscription, quoted
at p. 83, note 1, king; how it is to be reconciled with this, that
not merely does the native legend (in Agathias ii. 27) make Pabek a
shoemaker, but also the contemporary Dio (if in reality Zonaras, xii.
15, has borrowed these words from him) names Artaxares ἐξ ἀφανῶν καὶ
ἀδόξων, we do not know. Naturally the Roman authors take the side of
the weak legitimate Arsacid against the dangerous usurper.
[71] Strabo (under Tiberius) xv. 3, 24: νῦν δ’ ἤδη καθ’ αὐτοὺς
συνεστῶτες οἱ Πἐρσαι βασιλέας ἔχουσιν ὑπηκόους ἑτέροις βασιλεῦσι,
πρότερον μὲν Μακεδόσι, νῦν δὲ Παρθυαίοις.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account