The provincial letters of Blaise Pascal : $b A new translation, with historical introduction and notes, by the Rev. Thomas M'CriePascal, Blaise
Religion
The provincial letters of Blaise Pascal : $b A new translation, with historical introduction and notes, by the Rev. Thomas M'Crie
Pascal, Blaise
Jansenists -- France -- Early works to 1800; Jesuits -- Early works to 1800; Port-Royal des Champs (Abbey) -- Early works to 1800
In the first edition it was said to be the Landgrave of Darmstat, by
mistake, as shown in a note by Nicole.
LETTER XVI.[277]
TO THE REVEREND FATHERS, THE JESUITS.
SHAMEFUL CALUMNIES OF THE JESUITS AGAINST PIOUS CLERGYMEN AND INNOCENT
NUNS.
_December 4, 1656._
REVEREND FATHERS,—I now come to consider the rest of your calumnies, and
shall begin with those contained in your advertisements, which remain to
be noticed. As all your other writings, however, are equally well
stocked with slander, they will furnish me with abundant materials for
entertaining you on this topic as long as I may judge expedient. In the
first place, then, with regard to the fable which you have propagated in
all your writings against the Bishop of Ypres,[278] I beg leave to say,
in one word, that you have maliciously wrested the meaning of some
ambiguous expressions in one of his letters, which being capable of a
good sense, ought, according to the spirit of the Gospel, to have been
taken in good part, and could only be taken otherwise according to the
spirit of your Society. For example, when he says to a friend, “Give
yourself no concern about your nephew; I will furnish him with what he
requires from the money that lies in my hands,” what reason have you to
interpret this to mean, that he would take that money without restoring
it, and not that he merely advanced it with the purpose of replacing it?
And how extremely imprudent was it for you to furnish a refutation of
your own lie, by printing the other letters of the Bishop of Ypres,
which clearly show that, in point of fact, it was merely _advanced_
money, which he was bound to refund. This appears, to your confusion,
from the following terms in the letter, to which you give the date of
July 30, 1619: “Be not uneasy about the money _advanced_; he shall want
for nothing so long as he is here;” and likewise from another, dated
January 6, 1620, where he says: “You are in too great haste; when the
account shall become due, I have no fear but that the little credit
which I have in this place will bring me as much money as I require.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account