The psycho-analytic study of the familyFlugel, J. C. (John Carl)
Science
The psycho-analytic study of the family
Flugel, J. C. (John Carl)
Families; Marriage; Parent and child; Psychoanalysis
As regards the eating of the sacrifice, it may perhaps in one respect be
regarded as the consummation of the hostile act. Cronos eats his children
in order to be sure of getting rid of them; and the swallowing of children
or even of grown men by an ogre, giant, monster or witch is a not uncommon
theme in folklore. The eating of the parents by the children in their turn
is a natural and obvious form of revenge; and has actually been practised
by some primitive people[195].
At the same time eating may be regarded as an honour or as a sign of
affection; as is necessarily to some extent the case, since the totem
animal represents the god and is itself as a rule sacred and inviolable
except in certain circumstances. This aspect indeed obviously plays a part
of great importance in the Christian sacrament in its present form[196].
The most important aspect of all however is that in virtue of which the
eater is supposed to acquire or to participate in the nature, qualities
or properties of that which is eaten, the worshipper thus becoming one
with the God whose flesh and blood he consumes; in this way at one and
the same time:--(a) himself acquiring directly some of the qualities of
the divinity, (b) becoming assured of his kinship with God, the common
meal being regarded as the especial symbol of this kinship (as indeed of
kinship in general)[197], (c) becoming likewise assured of his kinship
with his fellow worshippers, all becoming brothers by participation in the
divine meal and in the underlying ideas--including of course the original
father hatred and the atonement for this--which this meal implies.
Thus it appears that the food which is consumed in the Communion
represents:--
(1) the Father
(a) as hated and killed,
(b) as honoured.
(2) the Son, as slain to atone for the father-murder and offered up in
honour to the Father.
The actual consumption of the food represents:--
(1) the eating of the Father
(a) as a sign of hostility,
(b) as a sign of honour or affection,
(c) as a means of partaking of the divine nature (_i. e._ acquiring
the father attributes).
(2) the eating of the Son, as a means of establishing identity with him
and thus sharing in the atonement which he has made by his sacrifice.
(3) the establishment of a sense of communion and of kinship between the
fellow worshippers themselves and between them and the deity, through
participation in the divine meal with all that this implies.
[Sidenote: The influence of family tendencies in religion]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account