The psycho-analytic study of the familyFlugel, J. C. (John Carl)
Science
The psycho-analytic study of the family
Flugel, J. C. (John Carl)
Families; Marriage; Parent and child; Psychoanalysis
As regards these latter, however, it must be borne in mind that here (as
in most other cases of the treatment of the abnormal in Psychology) the
distinction between normal and abnormal is one which is drawn for the sake
of practical convenience only, and which indicates merely a difference
of degree not a difference in quality, between the phenomena which it
distinguishes. Even those manifestations which mark the most extreme
departures from the normal are present as possibilities in all of us:
it is only a question of the extent of our tendency towards them and of
the intensity of the predisposing causes in our environment. A slight
alteration in the balance of our mental forces or in the circumstances of
our life and upbringing, and we too might fall victims to the aberrations
which now seem to us so repulsive, foolish or ridiculous, when displayed
by others. The abnormal in Psychology is most frequently only an aspect
of the normal magnified beyond its usual dimensions and thus brought
out of proportion to the other aspects of the mind. For this reason the
study of the abnormal is often the best means of investigating the minute
structure of the normal: and in the present case we shall find that when
we have reviewed the principal abnormalities and variations in the psychic
development of the individual in relation to his family, we shall be in
a much more favourable position for arriving at a decision as to our own
attitude--theoretical and practical--towards this development than if we
had simply considered the process of growth in its strictly normal aspects.
[Sidenote: Abnormalities of development at different levels]
Byways in human development, both emotional and intellectual, may diverge
from the main track at various points in its course--some near its origin
in the infantile strata of the mind, some at a later stage of progress.
Those which leave the main track at a relatively early point preserve, as
a rule, throughout their course some more or less definite indication of
their early origin, some trace of infantile or childish character; while
those which take their departure at a subsequent stage bear the marks of
a later, but still immature, condition of development. As each variation
or aberration thus, to some extent, corresponds in nature to the point
of development at which it took its rise, it is possible to classify
such variations and aberrations according to their point of origin; and
to regard each one as a fixation or arrest of development at a certain
point in the main track of progress. What is true of human development in
general is true more particularly of the development of the individual's
relation to his family. The more primitive variations will be found to
bear the characteristics of the early stages of the individual's mental
growth while the later variations will indicate a more advanced condition
of this growth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account