The Psychology of ArithmeticThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
The Psychology of Arithmetic
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Arithmetic -- Study and teaching
In the Stanford form of the Binet tests counting four pennies is given
as an ability of the typical four-year-old. Counting 13 pennies
correctly in at least one out of two trials, and knowing three of the
four coins,--penny, nickel, dime, and quarter,--are given as abilities
of the typical six-year-old.
THE PERCEPTION OF NUMBER AND QUANTITY
We know that educated adults can tell how many lines or dots, etc., they
see in a single glance (with an exposure too short for the eye to move)
up to four or more, according to the clearness of the objects and their
grouping. For example, Nanu ['04] reports that when a number of bright
circles on a dark background are shown to educated adults for only .033
second, ten can be counted when arranged to form a parallelogram, but
only five when arranged in a row. With certain groupings, of course,
their 'perception' involves much inference, even conscious addition and
multiplication. Similarly they can tell, up to twenty and beyond, the
number of taps, notes, or other sounds in a series too rapid for single
counting if the sounds are grouped in a convenient rhythm.
These abilities are, however, the product of a long and elaborate
learning, including the learning of arithmetic itself. Elementary
psychology and common experience teach us that the mere observation of
groups or quantities, no matter how clear their number quality appears
to the person who already knows the meanings of numbers, does not of
itself create the knowledge of the meanings of numbers in one who does
not. The experiments of Messenger ['03] and Burnett ['06] showed that
there is no direct intuitive apprehension even of two as distinct from
one. We have to _learn_ to feel the two touches or see the two dots or
lines as two.
We do not know by exact measurements the growth in children of this
ability to count or infer the number of elements in a collection seen or
series heard. Still less do we know what the growth would be without
the influence of school training in counting, grouping, adding, and
multiplying. Many textbooks and teachers seem to overestimate it
greatly. Not all educated adults can, apart from measurement, decide
with surety which of these lines is the longer, or which of these areas
is the larger, or whether this is a ninth or a tenth or an eleventh of a
circle.
[Illustration]
Children upon entering school have not been tested carefully in respect
to judgments of length and area, but we know from such studies as
Gilbert's ['94] that the difference required in their case is probably
over twice that required for children of 13 or 14. In judging weights,
for example, a difference of 6 is perceived as easily by children 13 to
15 years of age as a difference of 15 by six-year-olds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account