The Psychology of ArithmeticThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
The Psychology of Arithmetic
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Arithmetic -- Study and teaching
How much concrete material shall be presented will depend upon the fact
or relation or procedure which is to be made intelligible, and the
ability and knowledge of the pupil. Thus 'one half' will in general
require less concrete illustration than 'five sixths'; and five sixths
will require less in the case of a bright child who already knows 2/3,
3/4, 3/8, 5/8, 7/8, 2/5, 3/5, and 4/5 than in the case of a dull child
or one who only knows 2/3 and 3/4. As a general rule the same topic will
require less concrete material the later it appears in the school
course. If the meanings of the numbers are taught in grade 2 instead of
grade 1, there will be less need of blocks, counters, splints, beans,
and the like. If 1-1/2 + 1/2 = 2 is taught early in grade 3, there will
be more gain from the use of 1-1/2 inches and 1/2 inch on the foot rule
than if the same relations were taught in connection with the general
addition of like fractions late in grade 4. Sometimes the understanding
can be had either by connecting the idea with the reality directly, or
by connecting the two indirectly _via_ some other idea. The amount of
concrete material to be used will depend on its relative advantage per
unit of time spent. Thus it might be more economical to connect 5/12,
7/12, and 11/12 with real meanings indirectly by calling up the
resemblance to the 2/3, 3/4, 3/8, 5/8, 7/8, 2/5, 3/5, 4/5, and 5/6
already studied, than by showing 5/12 of an apple, 7/12 of a yard, 11/12
of a foot, and the like.
In general the economical course is to test the understanding of the
matter from time to time, using more concrete material if it is needed,
but being careful to encourage pupils to proceed to the abstract ideas
and general principles as fast as they can. It is wearisome and
debauching to pupils' intellects for them to be put through elaborate
concrete experiences to get a meaning which they could have got
themselves by pure thought. We should also remember that the new idea,
say of the meaning of decimal fractions, will be improved and clarified
by using it (see page 183 f.), so that the attainment of a _perfect_
conception of decimal fractions before doing anything with them is
unnecessary and probably very wasteful.
A few illustrations may make these principles more instructive.
(_a_) Very large numbers, such as 1000, 10,000, 100,000, and 1,000,000,
need more concrete aids than are commonly given. Guessing contests about
the value in dollars of the school building and other buildings, the
area of the schoolroom floor and other surfaces in square inches, the
number of minutes in a week, and year, and the like, together with
proper computations and measurements, are very useful to reënforce the
concrete presentations and supply genuine problems in multiplication and
subtraction with large numbers.
(_b_) Numbers very much smaller than one, such as 1/32, 1/64, .04,
and .002, also need some concrete aids. A diagram like that of
Fig. 57 is useful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account