The Psychology of ArithmeticThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
The Psychology of Arithmetic
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Arithmetic -- Study and teaching
Mere difficulty, mere failure, mere inadequacy of existing bonds, does
nothing. It is hard for me to add three eight-place numbers at a glance;
I have failed to find as effective illustrations for pages 276 to 277 as
I wished; my existing sensori-motor connections are inadequate to
playing a golf course in 65. But these events and conditions have done
nothing to stimulate me in respect to the behavior in question. In the
first of the three there is no annoying lack and no dynamic influence at
all; in the second there was to some degree an annoying lack--a slight
irritation at not getting just what I wanted,--and this might have
impelled me to further thinking (though it did not, and getting one
tiptop illustration would as a rule stimulate me to hunt for others more
than failing to get such). In the third case the lack of the 65 does not
annoy me or have any noteworthy dynamic effect. The lack of 90 instead
of 95-100 is annoying and is at times a stimulus to further learning,
though not nearly so strong a stimulus as the attainment of the 90 would
be! At other times this annoying lack is distinctly inhibitory--a
stimulus to ceasing to learn. In the intellectual life the inhibitory
effect seems far the commoner of the two. Not getting answers seems as a
rule to make us stop trying to get them. The annoying lack of success
with a theoretical problem most often makes us desert it for problems to
whose solution the existing bonds promise to be more adequate.
The real issue in all this concerns the relative strength, in the
pupil's intellectual life, of the "negative reaction" of behavior in
general. An animal whose life processes are interfered with so that an
annoying state of affairs is set up, changes his behavior, making one
after another responses as his instincts and learned tendencies
prescribe, until the annoying state of affairs is terminated, or the
animal dies, or suffers the annoyance as less than the alternatives
which his responses have produced. When the annoying state of affairs is
characterized by the failure of things as they are to minister to a
craving--as in cases of hunger, loneliness, sex-pursuit, and the
like,--we have stimulus to action by an annoying lack or need, with
relief from action by the satisfaction of the need.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account