The Psychology of ArithmeticThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
The Psychology of Arithmetic
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Arithmetic -- Study and teaching
7,862,166 whites
233,634 free negroes
1,538,022 slaves
---------
9,633,822
In this problem three different kinds of addends are combined, if we
accept the usual distinction. Some may say that this is a mistake,--that
the pupil transformed the 'whites,' 'free negroes,' and 'slaves' into a
common unit, such as 'people' of 'population' and then added these
common units. But this 'explanation' is entirely gratuitous, as one will
find if he questions the pupil about the process. It will be found that
the child simply added the figures as numbers only and then interpreted
the result, according to the statement of the problem, without so much
mental gymnastics. The writer has questioned hundreds of students in
Normal School work on this point, and he believes that the ordinary
mind-movement is correctly set forth here, no matter how well one may
maintain as an academic proposition that this is not logical. Many
classes in the Eastern Kentucky State Normal have been given this
problem to solve, and they invariably get the same result:--
'In a garden on the Summit are as many cabbage-heads as the total number
of ladies and gentlemen in this class. How many cabbage-heads in the
garden?'
And the blackboard solution looks like this each time:--
29 ladies
15 gentlemen
--
44 cabbage-heads
So, also, one may say: I have 6 times as many sheep as you have cows. If
you have 5 cows, how many sheep have I? Here we would multiply the
number of cows, which is 5, by 6 and call the result 30, which must be
linked with the idea of sheep because the conditions imposed by the
problem demand it. The mind naturally in this work separates the pure
number from its situation, as in algebra, handles it according to the
laws governing arithmetical combinations, and labels the result as the
statement of the problem demands. This is expressed in the following,
which is tacitly accepted in algebra, and should be accepted equally in
arithmetic:
'In all computations and operations in arithmetic, all numbers are
essentially abstract and should be so treated. They are concrete only in
the thought process that attends the operation and interprets the
result.'"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account