The Psychology of ArithmeticThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
The Psychology of Arithmetic
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Arithmetic -- Study and teaching
The criticism was valid and should have been met in part by replacing
the deductive explanations by inductive verifications, and in part by
using the deductive reasoning as a check after the process itself is
mastered. The very same discussions of place-value which are futile as
proof that you must do a certain thing before you have done it, often
become instructive as an explanation of why the thing that you have
learned to do and are familiar with and have verified by other tests
works as well as it does. The general deductive theory of arithmetic
should not be learned only to be forgotten. Much of it should, by most
pupils, not be learned at all. What is learned should be learned much
later than now, as a synthesis and rationale of habits, not as their
creator. What is learned of such deductive theory should rank among the
most rather than least permanent of a pupil's stock of arithmetical
knowledge and power. There are bonds which are formed only to be lost,
and bonds formed only to be lost _in their first form_, being used in a
new organization as material for bonds of a higher order; but the bonds
involved in deductive explanations of why certain processes are right
are not such: they are not to be formed just to be forgotten, nor as
mere propædeutics to routine manipulations.
PROPÆDEUTIC BONDS
The formation of bonds to a limited strength because they are to be lost
in their first form, being worked over in different ways in other bonds
to which they are propædeutic or contributing is the most important case
of low strength, or rather low permanence, in bonds.
The bond between four 5s in a column to be added and the response of
thinking '10, 15, 20' is worth forming, but it is displaced later by the
multiplication bond or direct connection of 'four 5s to be added' with
'20.' Counting by 2s from 2, 3s from 3, 4s from 4, 5s from 5, etc.,
forms serial bonds which as series might well be left to disappear.
Their separate steps are kept as permanent bonds for use in column
addition, but their serial nature is changed from 2 (and 2) 4, (and 2)
6, (and 2) 8, etc., to two 2s = 4, three 2s = 6, four 2s = 8, etc.;
after playing their part in producing the bonds whereby any multiple of
2 by 2 to 9, can be got, the original serial bonds are, as series,
needed no longer. The verbal response of saying 'and' in adding, after
helping to establish the bonds whereby the general set of the mind
toward adding coöperates with the numbers seen or thought of to produce
their sum, should disappear; or remain so slurred in inner speech as to
offer no bar to speed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account