The Psychology of ArithmeticThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
The Psychology of Arithmetic
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Arithmetic -- Study and teaching
9 × 7 | 10 | 700 | 20,000| 500-2000
7 × 9 | 10 | 700 | 20,000| 500-1750
8 × 6 | 10 | 750 | 20,000| 500-2500
6 × 8 | 9 | 700 | 20,000| 500-2500
| | | |
63 ÷ 9 | 9 | 500 | 4,500| 300-2500
64 ÷ 9 | 9 | 200 | 4,000| 100- 700
65 ÷ 9 | 8 | 200 | 4,000| 100- 600
66 ÷ 9 | 7 | 200 | 4,000| 100- 550
67 ÷ 9 | 7 | 200 | 4,000| 75- 450
68 ÷ 9 | 6 | 200 | 4,000| 87- 575
69 ÷ 9 | 6 | 200 | 4,000| 87- 450
70 ÷ 9 | 5 | 200 | 4,000| 75- 575
71 ÷ 9 | 5 | 200 | 4,000| 75- 700
| | | |
_XX_ | 40 | 550 |1,000,000| 300-2000
_XO_ | 20 | 500 | 11,500| 150-2000
_XXX_ | 15 | 450 | 12,000| 100-1000
_XXO_ | 25 | 400 | 15,000| 150-1000
_XOO_ | 15 | 400 | 5,000| 100-1000
_XOX_ | 10 | 400 | 10,000| 100- 975
======================================================================
Having made his estimates the reader should compare them first with
similar estimates made by experienced teachers (shown on page 124 f.),
and then with the results of actual counts for representative textbooks
in arithmetic (shown on pages 126 to 132).
It will be observed in Table 2 that even experienced teachers vary
enormously in their estimates of the amount of practice given by an
average textbook in arithmetic, and that most of them are in serious
error by overestimating the amount of practice. In general it is the
fact that we use textbooks in arithmetic with very vague and erroneous
ideas of what is in them, and think they give much more practice than
they do.
The authors of the textbooks as a rule also probably had only very vague
and erroneous ideas of what was in them. If they had known, they would
almost certainly have revised their books. Surely no author would
intentionally provide nearly four times as much practice on 2 + 2 as on
8 + 8, or eight times as much practice on 2 × 2 as on 9 × 8, or eleven
times as much practice on 2 - 2 as on 17 - 8, or over forty times as
much practice on 2 ÷ 2 as on 75 ÷ 8 and 75 ÷ 9, both together. Surely
no author would have provided intentionally only twenty to thirty
occurrences each of 16 - 7, 16 - 8, 16 - 9, 17 - 8, 17 - 9, and 18 - 9
for the entire course through grade 6; or have left the practice on
60 ÷ 7, 60 ÷ 8, 60 ÷ 9, 61 ÷ 7, 61 ÷ 8, 61 ÷ 9, and the like to occur
only about once a year!
TABLE 3
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account