Binns’ theory is that physiological sleep is in antagonism to
intellectual activity, being the active process of nutrition,
assimilation of food, or of the repair of the waste of the body; that
it concerns the nerve centers: that is, “the ganglionic system.” It
is a generally admitted theory that man’s activity, whether physical
or mental, “uses up” tissue and nerve force, and that it is only when
repair exceeds this waste that life is maintained at a high standard.
If the activities of life be many and varied, much sleep according to
this theory would be needed to repair the waste of force. Experience
has shown that those who live purely physical lives, doing hard manual
labor with little mental exercise, need the most sleep. Those whose
activities are mostly mental generally sleep fewer hours, though the
desire for sleep may be as intense when it comes as is that of the
manual laborer. (See Appendix, Questionnaire.)
Regarding sleep as a necessity, in itself an “active and positive
faculty,” Binns says of it that “it is the true ‘vis medicatrix
naturæ’ —the healing force of nature—to whose vigilance we are
indebted for that condition of mind and body called ‘health.’” However,
he is not an advocate of long hours of sleep for everybody. He thinks
individuals differ widely in the amount of sleep needed. He makes the
general statement that, “the lower the cerebral organs in the scale
of organization, the greater the power of sleep.” On this point all
the authorities agree, and even in our own experience we learn that.
The animals nearest to man in point of development sleep more than man
sleeps; and, among men, those who live the most sluggish mental and
emotional lives sleep longer than those whose brains are more active.
There may, of course, be exceptions to this rule, and yet those
exceptions would not disprove that there is a rule. Much depends,
says the good doctor, upon the peculiarities “of the individual; the
culture of his mind; his amusement, his food, his occupation, and the
temper with which he wooes sleep. General Elliot never slept more
than four hours out of twenty-four, and his food consisted wholly of
bread, vegetables, and water.” This seems like one more link in the
chain that binds up our habits of eating with our power to sleep.
Just as heavy eating late at night may so disturb our slumber as to
leave us practically sleepless, so general heavy eating may render us
so incapable of mental activity that sleep may take possession of
us. General Elliot’s slight need of sleep was probably due, in large
measure, to his light diet, and Dr. Binns seems to be of that opinion.
We notice that flesh-eating animals, especially serpents, gorge and
then sleep long.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account