The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900Oregon Historical Society
History
The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, September, 1900
Oregon Historical Society
Oregon -- History -- Periodicals
husband could dispose of an unsatisfactory wife. He could kill her by
personal ill-usage,[2] or keep her to labor for means to purchase and
support another wife, or as many more as his means and desires induced
him to buy.[3]
The general relations between the husband and wife among the native
races in Western Oregon were that the husband should kill the game or
catch the fish, as the subsistence was from game or fish. The dressing
of skins for clothing, the weaving of rush mats for camp covers or for
beds, the preparation of cedar bark for clothing, nets and ropes, and
the digging of roots, gathering of berries, etc., were all left to the
wife and the slaves at her command, if there were any. The husband and
wife seemed to have separate property rights as to themselves, and on
the death of either the most valuable of it, and often all of it, was
sacrificed to the manes of the dead. Sometimes living slaves were bound
and placed near the dead body of a person of importance in the tribe.[4]
Under this custom, when a leading man like Chenamus, Chief of the
Chinooks, died, the body was carefully swathed in cedar bark wrappings;
his war canoe or barge of state was used as his coffin, and his second
best canoe, if he had two, was inverted and placed over the body as a
defense against the weather or wild beasts; a small hole was made in the
lower canoe and it was placed in a slanting position to facilitate
complete drainage. No money reward would induce an Indian of the Lower
Columbia to enter and labor in a canoe that had been thus used for the
dead. Thus the best and generally all the property worth notice was
rendered useless to the living. The wife in such a case might be owner
of slaves in her own right, or of a _business canoe_, and in some cases
of a small canoe used on the Lower Columbia root gathering, or by the
husband or sons in hunting water fowl. Such a wife becoming a widow—
supposing her dead husband a chief, succeeded by a son by another of his
wives, or by a brother, unfriendly and jealous of her influence,—would
not be a totally helpless outcast. She would have the means of gathering
her own subsistence. This, however, was above the common lot of native
widows. The same custom of destroying the property of the dead prevailed
amongst natives of the Willamette Valley when the American home builders
first came; and it was a common sight to come upon a recently made grave
and scare the buzzards or coyotes from feasting on carcasses of horses
slain to the departed, the grave itself being indicated by the cooking
utensils and tawdry personal adornments of the deceased. Under this
custom there was no property left for distribution by the average
native. A chief, living with thrifty care for his family, might leave
slaves to be divided among his sons or daughters, as some few did, but
often when the heirs were sons or daughters of different mothers bitter
family feuds were a natural result, and the law of might decided. There
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account