The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 4, March, 1903-December, 1903Oregon Historical Society
History
The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 4, March, 1903-December, 1903
Oregon Historical Society
Oregon -- History -- Periodicals
The early American history of California was a topic in which Mr.
Bancroft was naturally interested because of his own mining experience
during the early gold days. Nemos' schedule shows that he wrote sixty
pages for the sixth volume of California, a circumstance which taken
with our knowledge of fields of research into which he entered in the
preparation of California Pastoral and Popular Tribunals makes us
reasonably sure that he wrote the first, second, and twenty-fifth
chapters. Mrs. Victor, who in her work on Oregon had been found
especially strong as a writer on political subjects, was assigned the
task of working up the political history of California, and, according
to her own statement, wrote two hundred and thirty-four pages for this
volume. We can positively identify chapters twelve, thirteen,
twenty-three, and twenty-four as her work. From the similarity of
their subject-matter to some already treated by her in the Oregon
history, and from the fact that their addition to the work just
indicated brings the total almost exactly to the figures given, we may
conclude that she also wrote the third, fourth, and fifth chapters.
The chapter entitled Mexican Land Titles is Oak's work, and the
remainder of the volume, almost two thirds, is that of Nemos.
Information given by Mrs. Victor shows that she wrote for the final
volume of the History of California four hundred and eighty-nine pages
on politics and railroads. We are thus enabled to designate as her
work chapters nine to twenty-one inclusive, and chapter twenty-five.
This still leaves to her credit eighteen pages to be located in some
other chapter. The rest of the volume, embracing the portions dealing
with commerce, manufactures, agriculture, and mining, was written,
Nemos says, by himself. Before publication, the sheets on California
judiciary were submitted to Justice Stephen J. Field for his approval.
The estimate of certain pioneer characters in the California history,
together with the adopting of the Mexican view of the conquest of that
state by Americans, brought down upon Mr. Bancroft the condemnation of
the California Society of Pioneers, who, in 1894, expelled him from
honorary membership in their body. (See pamphlet proceedings of the
Society of California Pioneers in reference to the History of Hubert
Howe Bancroft.) It is a curious fact, however, that the passages which
were made the basis of the society's indictment are almost entirely in
the first five volumes of the California history, which were written
by Oak. He has declared that even the revisions were his own and not
Bancroft's.
The History of Utah, another storm-center among the histories, was
written by Bates and Bancroft, the former, according to Nemos,
preparing twice as much manuscript as the latter. The earlier chapters
are by Bancroft, but no more certain assignment of their respective
shares in the work can be made from the information at hand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account