The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 4, March, 1903-December, 1903Oregon Historical Society
History
The quarterly of the Oregon Historical Society, Vol. 4, March, 1903-December, 1903
Oregon Historical Society
Oregon -- History -- Periodicals
Throughout the West, with the exception of Louisiana, the number of
females to each 100,000 men is under the national average, which is
95,353. Louisiana reports 98,871, and Utah, for obvious reasons,
follows with 95,324. Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Texas also have
between 90,000 and 95,000 females to each 100,000 men, and in
Minnesota, Nebraska, South Dakota, Indian Territory, New Mexico, and
Oklahoma, the average is over 85,000 and under 90,000. The proportion
of women to each 100,000 men is exceedingly low in the Pacific coast
and mountain states, being 80,987 in California; 73,265 in Idaho;
62,390 in Montana; 65,352 in Nevada; 77,495 in Oregon; 70,329 in
Washington; 59,032 in Wyoming. Alaska reports 38,629.
Here, as in other parts of the Union, urban population is growing
faster than rural. Comparison for this discussion is with the census
of 1870, as the returns for any previous year would make too meagre a
showing. In 1870 the West had 56 of the 226 places that reported a
population of 4,000 and over. In 1890 the number was 176 out of 899,
and in 1900 it was 251 out of 1,158. Of the West's total population in
1900, 20.3 per cent was urban, against 37.3 percent for the Union. In
1900, 17.6 per cent of the total urban population of the country lived
in the West, 13.1 per cent in 1890, and 14.1 per cent in 1870.
California with 48.9 per cent and Colorado with 41.2 are above the
average for the Union, while Washington, with 36.4 makes a close
approach to the mark. For other states the average is: Iowa, 20.5;
Kansas, 19.2; Louisiana, 25.1; Minnesota, 31; Missouri, 34.9; Montana
and Wyoming, 28.6; Nebraska, 20.8; Oregon, 27.6; Utah, 29.4; Arkansas,
6.9; Idaho, 6.2; Nevada, 10.6; North Dakota, 5.4; South Dakota, 7.2;
Texas, 14.9; Arizona, 10.6; Indian Territory, 2.5; New Mexico, 6.1;
Oklahoma, 5. The following statement shows the drift of the population
into the cities:
=================+=============+============+============+===========
| | | | Increase
| 1900. | 1890. | 1870. | per cent,
| | | | 1870-1900.
+-------------+------------+------------+-----------
Urban population | 5,024,876 | 3,723,427 | 1,145,033 | 338
Rural population | 16,009,778 | 12,950,982 | 5,732,063 | 179
+-------------+-------- ---+------------+-----------
Total | 21,034,654 | 16,674,409 | 6,877,096 | 206
-----------------+-------------+------------+------------+-----------
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account