The Quarterly Review, Volume 162, No. 324, April, 1886Various
History
The Quarterly Review, Volume 162, No. 324, April, 1886
Various
Periodicals
'There was no thought, no warning held out to the country,
that a radical reform in the relations between Great Britain
and Ireland would be the main work of the present
Parliament.... The country had no sufficient warning--I
think I may say the country had no warning at all--that any
proposals of the magnitude and vastness of those which were
unfolded to us last night were to be considered in the
present Parliament, much less were to form the first subject
of consideration upon the meeting of this Parliament. I am
perfectly aware that there exists in our Constitution no
principle of the mandate. I know that the mandate of the
constituencies is as unknown to our Constitution, as the
distinction between fundamental laws and laws which are of
an inferior sanction. But, although no principle of a
mandate may exist, I maintain that there are certain limits
which Parliament is bound to observe, and beyond which
Parliament has morally not the right to go in its relations
with the constituencies. The constituencies of Great Britain
are the source of the power, at all events, of this branch
of Parliament, and I maintain that in the presence of an
emergency which could not have been foreseen, the House of
Commons has no moral right to initiate legislation,
especially upon its first meeting, of which the
constituencies were not informed, and of which the
constituencies might have been informed, and as to which, if
they had been so informed, there is, at all events, the very
greatest doubt what their decision might be.'
Over and over again in the Parliament of 1874 and of 1880 have we heard
Mr. Gladstone appealing to this principle, that schemes of crucial
importance ought to be discussed before the constituencies; yet the most
important proposal made in Parliament for some generations is presented
after a general election, in which the constituencies were invited by
the Prime Minister and his colleagues to believe, that this particular
question was outside the region of practical politics.
No sooner had it become apparent that the country had refused that
renewal of power which Mr. Gladstone had asked for, than his resolution
not to accept defeat was promptly manifested. Public men remembered his
use of the Royal prerogative in 1872, to carry into execution a scheme
for which he had sought and failed to obtain the consent of Parliament.
He had not been a week at Hawarden after his journey from Scotland, when
people became conscious that the return to office, which he had told the
country would be their security against Mr. Parnell, he was now ready to
seek with the aid of that leader.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account