The Queen's Maries: A Romance of HolyroodWhyte-Melville, G. J. (George John)
General
The Queen's Maries: A Romance of Holyrood
Whyte-Melville, G. J. (George John)
Mary, Queen of Scots, 1542-1587 -- Fiction
‘Not so fast,’ said she, ‘not so fast. I am discussing possibilities,
Master Randolph, and you are accepting them for certainties; but enough
of this--amusement is our chief business to-night. See, the queen of
the revels is looking anxiously this way, and you have not been to pay
her your homage yet. Delay no longer, her displeasure to-night is far
weightier and more implacable than mine.’
As she spoke she dismissed him with a courteous gesture, and Randolph,
nothing loth, commenced paying his court most assiduously to Mary
Beton, with the double object of spending his time agreeably and
worming out of her, ere the night was past, some corroboration of the
Queen’s vague hints as to her approaching marriage.
It was with secret pride and exultation the Twelfth-night queen, in all
her assumed splendour, beheld the ambassador approach the circle that
formed her sham Court. It would be too much to say that Mary Beton was
deeply in love with Randolph, but she experienced from his attentions
certain agreeable feelings, that originated in gratified vanity and a
sense of her own superiority to her companions. It was indeed no petty
triumph to have secured the homage of the fastidious and cynical Thomas
Randolph: the man who was the type of refinement and the incarnation of
selfishness, avowedly a despiser of women and a free-thinker in love.
The pleasure, too, was doubtless in no small degree enhanced by the
care-worn face of Alexander Ogilvy, who continued to haunt the Court,
with a hopeless perseverance truly edifying, and made himself miserable
with the self-immolating regularity peculiar to a lover, and totally
inexplicable on any grounds of reason or expediency.
Mary Beton had no objection in the world; she liked to have two strings
to her bow. Two! Where is the woman who would refuse half-a-dozen? With
all their vanity and all their libertinism, thus much we may safely say
in favour of the ruder sex--a man is usually indisposed to have more
than one attachment on his hands at a time. He may behave ungratefully,
unfeelingly, brutally, to Dora, but it is for the sake of Flora. For
however short a period it may be, yet, _while_ he wears those colours,
Nora looking out for prey in every direction, shall strive to fascinate
him in vain. But how different is the conduct of the last-named
personage: brilliant and seductive, it is no reason, because she is
herself in love with Tom, that she should refrain from the massacre of
Jack, Dick, and Harry; nay, if Bill be fortunate enough to spend an
hour or two in her company, away with him to the shambles too! Shall
we pity Nora so very much when she wears the willow for the faithless
Tom, and finds out too late that she never really cared a pin for the
other victims who, more or less damaged, have made their escape from
the toils?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account