Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600 -- Fiction
What added gall to bitterness with the Jews was that, from the time of
the captivity in Babylon and Persia, from five to seven centuries before
Christ, they had not known a national, safe, stable government of their
own. There were more Jews in Egypt and Asia Minor than in Palestine.
Faction had followed faction; revolution had followed revolution till
the Chosen People were the prey to any conqueror from Egypt to Persia;
and so there grew up the hope of a Redeemer, a Messiah, a royal son of
the line of David, to throw off the conqueror’s yoke and lead them to
victory. Such a Messiah, the prophets and the scrolls of the prophets
foretold. A Sadducee might be a bigoted sceptical materialist, but when
he heard the scrolls of the seers of 500 to 700 B.C. read, predicting
exactly what had happened to Babylonia and Assyria and Persia and
Greece, the agnostic Sadducee was not prepared to deny there might be a
Messiah. Somehow, in the modern mind, the Pharisee is held in lower
esteem than the Sadducee. The Pharisee was a gentle and, it might be,
attudinizing self-conscious poseur; but he was a scholar, and he was
liberal, and he was a gentleman. The Sadducee was a hard, ignorant,
materialistic bigot. He swore by Moses, but denied a future life and set
himself to grasp all the good things of this life within reach, and had
at the time of Christ’s death captured the best sinecures among the
offices of the high priests and council of seventy. He hated the Roman
with a bigoted, materialistic hatred, though he played politics with him
for his own job. The disappointment of both Sadducees and Pharisees at a
poor Nazarene named Jesus, calling himself the Messiah and gaining an
enormous following, flamed into delirious fanatic frenzy; and just then
rose the Zealots and Sicarii (short sword fighters) shouting “freedom at
any cost” and rallying all Jews in the Passover of spring—when more
than two million pilgrims visited the Holy City—to rise and throw off
the Roman yoke. The city gates were shut. The citizens inside had no
choice but to join the rebels, or let themselves down by ropes from the
walls at night and flee for the desert; but many citizens, knowing the
power of Rome and having all their means invested in Jerusalem, tried to
compromise. They were plundered, tortured, murdered. Women and children
were held for ransom, or hostages for the loyalty of the waverers; and
the rebellion that had flamed up in the name of “freedom” presently ran
lawless riot under an ægis better named “folly”; and for seven months
the Holy City was ruled by brute-beast crime and anarchy. If the
Sadducees and the Pharisees had intrigued with the rebellion at first,
they were now trapped in their own intrigue, for they saw their temple
chests rifled of the revenues of almost a century, the gold sheathing
ripped from the great pillars and colonnades, the holy wine brought from
vault and cellar and poured out, mingled with human blood, in a deluge
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account