The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to WredeSchweitzer, Albert
Religion
The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to Wrede
Schweitzer, Albert
Jesus Christ -- Biography -- History and criticism; Jesus Christ -- Historicity
The rôle of the Messiah, who prior to His supernatural manifestation
remains in concealment upon earth, is therefore passive. He who is
conscious of a Messianic vocation does not seek to found a Kingdom among
men. He waits with confidence. He issues forth from His passivity with the
sole purpose of making atonement, by vicarious suffering, for the sins of
the people, in order that it may be possible for God to bring about the
new condition of things. If, in spite of the repentance of the people and
the occurrence of the signs which pointed to its being at hand, the coming
of the Kingdom should be delayed, the man who is conscious of a Messianic
vocation must, by His death, compel the intervention of God. His vocation
in this world is to die.
Brought within the lines of these reflections the Life of Jesus shapes
itself as follows.
Jesus was the tool of a mystical sect allied to the Essenes, the head of
which was doubtless that Joseph of Arimathea who makes so sudden and
striking an appearance in the Gospel narrative. This party desired to
bring about the coming of the Kingdom of Heaven by mystical means, whereas
the mass of the people, led astray by the Pharisees, thought to force on
its coming by means of a rising. In the preacher of a spiritual Kingdom of
Heaven, who was resolved to go to death for His cause, the mystical party
discovered Messiah the son of Joseph, and they recognised that His death
was necessary to make possible the coming of the heavenly Messiah
predicted by Daniel. That Jesus Himself was the Messiah of Daniel, that He
would immediately rise again in order to ascend to His heavenly throne,
and would come thence with the hosts of heaven to establish the Kingdom of
Heaven, these people did not themselves believe. But they encouraged Him
in this belief, thinking that He would hardly commit Himself to a
sacrificial death from which there was to be no resurrection. It was left
uncertain to His mind whether Jehovah would be content with the repentance
of the people, in so far as it had taken place, as realising the necessary
condition for the bringing in of the Kingdom of Heaven, or whether an
atonement by blood, offered by the death of Messiah the son of Joseph,
would be needful. It had been explained to Him that when the calculated
year of grace arrived, He must go up to Jerusalem and endeavour to rouse
the Jews to Messianic enthusiasm in order to compel Jehovah to come to
their aid with His heavenly hosts. From the action of Jehovah it could
then be discovered whether the preaching of repentance and baptism would
suffice to make atonement for the people before God or not. If Jehovah did
not appear, a deeper atonement must be made; Jesus must pay the penalty of
death for the sins of the Jews, but on the third day would rise again from
the dead and ascend to the throne of God and come again thence to found
the Kingdom of Heaven. “Any one can see,” concludes Ghillany, “that our
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account