The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to WredeSchweitzer, Albert
Religion
The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to Wrede
Schweitzer, Albert
Jesus Christ -- Biography -- History and criticism; Jesus Christ -- Historicity
For fifty years the two earliest Evangelists, in spite of their poverty of
incident, sufficed for the needs of the Christians. The “fire of Jesus”
was fed chiefly by the Pauline Gospel. The original form of the Gospel of
Luke accordingly became the starting‐point of the next stage of
development. Thus arose the Gospel of Mark. Mark was not a native of
Palestine, but a man of Roman extraction living in Decapolis, who had not
the slightest knowledge of the localities in which the life of Jesus was
really passed. He undertook, about the year 130, “in the interest of the
new Christian settlement at Jerusalem in Hadrian’s time, deliberately and
consciously to transform the original plan of the Gospel history and to
represent the Lord as crucified at Jerusalem.” The man who from the year
132 onward, as Mark the Bishop, preached the word of the Crucified to a
Gentile Christian community amid the ruins of the holy city, had
previously, as Mark the Evangelist, taken care that a prophet should not
perish out of Jerusalem. In composing his Gospel he made use, in addition
to Luke, of a traditional source which he found in Decapolis. He
deliberately omitted the frequent journeys to Jerusalem which were still
found in the original Luke, and inserted instead Jesus’ journey to His
death. He it was, also, who made the Nazarite into the Nazarene, laying
the scene of Jesus’ youth in Nazareth. To the cures of demoniacs he added
magical acts such as the feeding of the multitude and the resurrection.
In Matthew, who appeared about 135, legend and fiction riot unchecked. In
addition, Jewish parables and sayings are put into the mouth of Jesus,
whereas He really had nothing to do with the Jewish world of ideas. For if
anything is certain, it is that the moral maxims of the latest Gospel are
of a distinctively Jewish origin. About the middle of the second century
the originals of John and Luke underwent redaction. The redaction of the
Logos Gospel was completed by the addition of the twenty‐first chapter;
the last redaction of Luke was perhaps carried out by Justin Martyr, fresh
from completing his “Dialogue with Trypho”! Thus John and Luke are, in
this final form, which is full of contradictions, the latest Gospels, and
the saying is fulfilled about the first being last, and the last first.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account