The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to WredeSchweitzer, Albert
Religion
The quest of the historical Jesus : $b a critical study of its progress from Reimarus to Wrede
Schweitzer, Albert
Jesus Christ -- Biography -- History and criticism; Jesus Christ -- Historicity
Again, is the saying about the gluttonous man and wine‐bibber a sufficient
basis for the contrast between Jesus and the Baptist? Is not Jesus’
preaching of repentance gloomy as well as the Baptist’s? Where do we read
that He, in contrast with the Baptist, avoided dealing with masses of men?
Where did He give “the community of His disciples” marching orders to go
far and wide in the sense required by Bousset’s argument? Where is there a
word to tell us that He thought of His work among individuals and little
groups of men as the most important feature of His ministry? Are we not
told the exact contrary, that He “taught” His disciples as little as He
did the people? Is there any justification for characterising the
missionary journey of the Twelve, just because it directly contradicts
this view, as “an obscure and unintelligible tradition?”
Is it so certain that Jesus made a Messianic entry into Jerusalem, and
that, accordingly, He declared Himself to the disciples and to the High
Priest as Messiah in the present, and not in a purely future sense?
What are the sayings which justify us in making the attitude of opposition
which He took up towards the Rabbinic legalism into a “sense of the
absolute opposition between Himself and His people”? The very “absolute,”
with its ring of Schleiermacher, is suspicious.
All these, however, are subsidiary positions. The decisive point is: Can
Bousset make good the assertion that Jesus’ joy in life was a more or less
unconscious inner protest against the purely eschatological world‐
renouncing religious attitude, the primal expression of that “absolute”
antithesis to Judaism? Is it not the case that His attitude towards
earthly goods was wholly conditioned by eschatology? That is to say, were
not earthly goods emptied of any essential value in such a way that joy in
the world and indifference to the world were simply the final expression
of an ironic attitude which had been sublimated into pure serenity. That
is the question upon the answer to which depends the decision whether
Bousset’s position is tenable or not.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account