The Quest of the Simple LifeDawson, W. J. (William James)
Philosophy
The Quest of the Simple Life
Dawson, W. J. (William James)
Country life
'O my friend, if I have said anything that sounds unfriendly, do not
believe it of me; do not doubt that I love you. I think I should not
have written thus but that in your last letter you expressed pity for
me, and that stung me, I confess. And so I retort, you see, by pitying
you, which is not admirable in me. Therefore let me say, if you care
still to please me, do not, in any further letters you may write, ever
express the least pity for me. Quite honestly I say I do not need
pity, for I am perfectly happy. In giving all the time and money I can
spare to the poor in Lucraft's Row, I have really renounced nothing;
or, if I have, I am so unconscious of sacrifice that I can only say
with Browning:
Renounce joy for thy fellow's sake?
That's joy beyond joy!
There are half a dozen ragged boys who love me: there are twenty more
who will do so in time; and there is my drunken friend with the dog's
eyes, who looks to me to save him from the pit; what more can I ask?
Fog and mire, grime and drudgery, these never trouble me, because I see
Lucraft's Row, lit with a star, waiting for me at the end of every day.
And the star is growing bigger and brighter, for it shines over a tiny
obscure Bethlehem where the Soul is getting itself born in a few humble
hearts. To be permitted to see this miracle, to assist in this
incarnation of the Soul of the People, is its own exceeding great
reward; and I may be envied, but never pitied.'
So ran the letter of my friend, and as I transcribe it I feel anew that
it is an indictment not to be easily set aside. I must think over what
I can reply to it. It seems as though if he be right in his mode of
life I must be wrong in mine; and yet may we not both be right? Are we
not seeing life from different angles?
Yes, I must have time for thought before I can reply to such a letter.
CHAPTER XII
AM I RIGHT?
I have given myself a week to think over the letter of my friend, and I
am now able to perceive that it is built upon a number of most
ingenious fallacies. The chief fallacy appears to be this--that he
insists that the race must always count for more than the individual,
and that the individual must fall in line and step with the average
conventions of the race at the expense of his own well-being, or be
judged a deserter and a recreant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account