The Railroad Question: A historical and practical treatise on railroads, and remedies for their abusesLarrabee, William
History
The Railroad Question: A historical and practical treatise on railroads, and remedies for their abuses
Larrabee, William
Railroads; Railroads -- United States; Railroads and state -- United States
Law, or a special law regulating the methods of construction
companies, which are probably doing more to demoralize the
railroad system--and doing it very insidiously, too--than
any other factor connected with these great arteries of the
country's prosperity.
"Legislative reform is greatly needed in the matter of
railroad reports, especially for the safety of investors,
and to prevent speculative abuses among railroad officials
and their friends and favorites. There should be statements
issued annually, or perhaps more frequently, upon the truth
of which everybody might rely. These should be sworn
statements, and should bear the signatures of at least three
of the directors. These directors should be required to
call to their aid expert accountants, and should have placed
at their disposal all the books of the company or
corporation and all the other papers necessary to verify the
accuracy of their report. The correctness of the statement,
when issued, would then be a foregone conclusion, and an
investor in London, Paris or Berlin could buy or sell on his
own judgment, an experiment which, under existing
arrangements, might prove very costly. It is proverbial that
a railroad statement now is defective in the most essential
particulars, and, to put it mildly, usually covers a
multitude of sins. According to one plan approved by
railroad companies, the statement published to-day, for
instance, is made to show a surplus of many millions, but
there is nothing said about an open construction account to
which the surplus is debtor. On this favorable showing (with
this _suppressio veri_) the stock goes up and the insiders
quickly unload upon the investment public. The following
statement, which comes out six months later, shows that the
surplus has been used to settle the construction
indebtedness. The surplus has disappeared; consequently the
stock suffers a serious decline. Those who bought on the
strength of the large surplus sell out, on being informed of
its distribution. Then the inside sharks come forward again
and purchase at reduced prices, probably at a depreciation
of from ten to fifteen points or more, and keep their stock
until the next periodical appearance of the bogus surplus.
Thus the insiders grow rich, while the outsiders become
poor. The only remedy for this abuse is a sworn statement at
regular intervals, and if the directors should commit
perjury they would render themselves liable to State prison.
If a few of them should be tempted to fall into the trap,
and be made examples of in this way, nothing would do more
to work a speedy reform in this contemptible method of
book-keeping.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account