The Rare Earths: Their Occurrence, Chemistry, and TechnologyLevy, Stanley Isaac
Science
The Rare Earths: Their Occurrence, Chemistry, and Technology
Levy, Stanley Isaac
Rare earths
In his examination of the yttria earths in 1842, Mosander described two
new oxides isolated from the old yttria. To one of these, an
orange-yellow earth which yielded colourless salts, he gave the name
Erbia; the second earth, which was colourless and gave rose-coloured
salts, he called Terbia. Bahr and Bunsen examined the yttria oxides in
1866, and obtained only the latter earth, which gave rose-coloured
salts; to this they applied Mosander’s name Erbia, and stated that the
earth to which Mosander had given that name had no existence.
Delafontaine, however, confirmed Mosander’s work, showing that the
orange-yellow earth which yielded colourless salts (Mosander’s Erbia)
had been fractionated out of their material by Bahr and Bunsen in the
double sulphate separation of the cerium group; to avoid further
confusion, however, he proposed to give to this oxide (Mosander’s Erbia)
the name Terbia, leaving for the colourless oxide, which forms
rose-coloured salts (which Mosander had called Terbia) the name Erbia
applied to it by Bahr and Bunsen. This reversed nomenclature has been
generally accepted.
Delafontaine,[300] continuing his work on the earths from samarskite
(see p. 168) announced in 1878 the discovery of a new oxide, Philippia,
intermediate between terbia and yttria; but this was subsequently shown
to be a mixture of yttria and terbia (see p. 133). In the same year,
Lawrence Smith[301] announced the discovery of another oxide, Mosandria,
from the samarskite earths; this was afterwards shown by Lecoq de
Boisbaudran to be a mixture of terbia with gadolinia.[302] In 1880
Marignac[303] announced the discovery of two more new oxides, Y_{α} and
Y_{β} from the same mineral; Y_{β} was afterwards found to be identical
with samaria, whilst Y_{α} was subsequently separated from the old
terbia earths by Lecoq de Boisbaudran, who proposed, with the assent of
Marignac, the name Gadolinium.[304] The terbia left after removal of the
erbia earths and gadolinia was believed by that author to be still a
mixture, a conclusion supported by the work of Hofmann and Kruss in
1893.[305]
[300] _Compt. rend._ 1878, ~87~, 559.
[301] _Ibid._ 1878, ~87~, 146.
[302] _Ibid._ 1886, ~102~, 647.
[303] _Compt. rend._ 1880, ~90~, 899.
[304] _Loc. cit._
[305] _Zeitsch. anorg. Chem._ 1893, ~4~, 27.
In 1886 Demarçay[306] isolated from samaria a new oxide, which he
designated S₁. From his work on this oxide in 1892-1893, de
Boisbaudran[307] concluded that samaria consisted of at least three
oxides, samaria proper, and two new oxides Z_{ξ} and Z_{ε}. In 1896,
Demarçay[308] separated an earth Σ, which showed the spark-spectrum of
Z_{ε} and the reversal spectrum of Z_{ξ}, and finally in 1901[309] he
obtained the new oxide in a fairly pure condition, and gave it the name
Europia.
[306] _Compt. rend._ 1886, ~102~, 1551.
[307] _Ibid._ 1892, ~114~, 575; _ibid._ 1893, ~116~, 611 and 674.
[308] _Ibid._ 1896, ~122~, 728.
[309] _Ibid._ 1901, ~132~, 1484.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account