Detective and mystery stories; Gethryn, Anthony (Fictitious character) -- Fiction; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
“My main reason—or one of my main reasons—for doing all this work
was to do Hastings’s little paper, _The Owl_, a good turn. The
report is really for them, though I don’t know when and to what
extent you will allow them to publish it. But I rely on you to see
that _The Owl_ gets as much journalistic fat as it can digest. No
other paper must hear a whisper until you’ve allowed Hastings to
make a scoop out of the ‘Dramatic New Developments.’
“Yours,
“A. R. Gethryn.”
“P.S.—Don’t forget that if you decide to let me try to arrange this
confession, I may fail. I don’t think I will; but I might. I shall
rely to a great extent upon the fact that I am something of an
actor.”
Coming to the end of this letter, Mr. Egbert Lucas had whistled
beneath his breath, instructed his secretary that on no account was he
to be disturbed, and had settled down—he has the most comfortable
chair in the Yard—to read the typewritten report.
Unfolding it, he murmured: “Unexpected chap, Gethryn. This ought to be
interesting.”
He read:—
“The Murder Of John Hoode
“Upon the morning of the 20th of August, 192–, I drove to the village
of Marling in Surrey. By 9.30 a. m. I had gained admission to the
house Abbotshall.
“Owing to circumstances which need not be set down here, and also, in
a great measure, to the courtesy and assistance of Superintendent Boyd
of Scotland Yard, I was able from the beginning to pursue unhampered
my own investigations. The result of these I give below.
“(For reasons which must, I think, be obvious, I have divided this
report into four parts. Also, I would point out that, for reasons
equally evident, the steps in my deduction, reasoning—call it what you
will—are not necessarily given here in their chronological order.)
I
“Immediately upon my arrival at Abbotshall, I spoke at some length
with Superintendent Boyd, who gave me the history of the affair as
obtained by him through close questioning of the inmates. It appeared
then that with the exception of the butler, these one and all had
alibis, complete in some cases and in others as nearly so as could be
expected of persons who had not known beforehand that they were like
to be accused of murder. (Later, of course, it was revealed—see
reports of the inquest—that Mr. Archibald Deacon’s alibi did not exist
in fact.)
“Superintendent Boyd and I at once agreed that to suspect the
alibiless Poole (the butler) was folly. He had been, obviously and by
common report, devoted to his master. Moreover, he is physically
incapable—even were he out of his mind—of dealing such blows as caused
the death of the murdered man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account