The Real Gladstone: An Anecdotal BiographyRitchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
History
The Real Gladstone: An Anecdotal Biography
Ritchie, J. Ewing (James Ewing)
Gladstone, W. E. (William Ewart), 1809-1898
Parliamentary career of the Victorian era had come at last to its close.’
About this time Mr. W. H. Smith, the ‘Old Mortality’ of _Punch_, writes:
‘Gladstone is more kindly in his personal relations than I have ever
known him, but he is physically much weaker, and the least exertion
knocks him up.’ Yet Mr. Gladstone long outlived his amiable critic.
When in March Mr. W. H. Smith moved the adoption of the report of the
Parnell Commission, Mr. Gladstone moved an amendment, and for two hours
poured forth a stream of eloquence, writes Sir R. Temple, like molten and
liquid gold from the furnace, with intonation and gesticulation quite
marvellous for a man of his advanced age; but his amendment was rejected.
In the debate on the Welsh Church he spoke for Disestablishment,
contending that when he argued for the Establishment the political forces
were for it, but now they were against it. In the next year Mr.
Gladstone made a speech in favour of peasant proprietorship, and on the
advantages of small tenures of land, as on the Continent. He also
opposed a grant for a railway near Zanzibar. In a broad-minded and
judicious manner he supported the Government Bill for developing
legislative measures in India, and for giving the natives increased
electoral rights. He also supported the Clergy Discipline (Immorality)
Bill in terms, says Sir R. Temple, of noble generosity towards the
organization of the Church, yet in language of courteous respect towards
Nonconformists.
In the Parliament ruled over by Mr. Smith, Mr. Gladstone—‘now seventy-six
years,’ writes Mr. Russell—entered on an extraordinary course of physical
and intellectual efforts with voice and pen, ‘in Parliament and on the
platform,’ on behalf of his favourite scheme of Irish Home Rule. In 1888
Mr. Neill O’Daunt writes: ‘Mr. Gladstone has been justly and ably
denouncing the Union in the _Westminster Review_ and other periodicals.
He has given many unanswerable arguments against it. He might add,
however, that if you want to appreciate the evils of the Union, look at
me, W. E. G. When Ireland lay crushed and prostrate beneath the miseries
of a seven years’ famine, when multitudes had perished by starvation, and
when all who could obtain the passage-money fled to America, I, W. E. G.,
secured that propitious moment to give a spur to the exodus by adding 52
per cent. to the taxation of Ireland, and pleaded the terms of the Union
as my justification for inflicting this scourge on the suffering people.’
It is characteristic of Mr. Gladstone’s loyalty that when engaged in
celebrating his golden wedding, he found time to attend the House of
Commons and deliver a speech in support of the Royal Grants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account