The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 1 (of 2)Jeaffreson, John Cordy
History
The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 1 (of 2)
Jeaffreson, John Cordy
Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
Whether _Zastrozzi_ (published on or a little before 5th June, 1810) was
written to the last lines at Eton, is uncertain. Bearing in mind every
young author's impatience to see himself in print, and having regard to
the natural consequences of this impatience in the excitable Shelley, I am
disposed to think the book would have appeared sooner, had it been ready
for the printers before the unruly Etonian left the public school. Time,
doubtless, was wasted in the futile negotiation with the Messrs. Longman &
Co. But the delay from this cause would scarcely account for the long
postponement of the publication, if the author finished the MS. under Mr.
Bethell's roof, and on receiving it back from the Longmans, sent it
straight to Messrs. Wilkie and Robinson.
Whilst the external evidence that Shelley wrote the letter is too light
for the scales of criticism, the internal evidence is conclusive that he
was not the contributor of the 'A.M. Oxon's' epistle, in behalf of Lord
Grenville's candidature for the Chancellorship. Medwin's assertion is idle
in respect to the composition, whose style shows it was not, could not
have been, written by the author of the puerile letters to the Messrs.
Longman, Messrs. Wilkie and Robinson, and Stockdale,--the puerile prose of
_Zastrozzi_ and _St. Irvyne_,--and the scarcely less puerile prose of the
letters and addresses written by the poet in Ireland. A comparison of the
'A.M. Oxon' letter of November 1809, with the numerous examples of
Shelley's English prose, will satisfy the critical reader that Shelley did
not, because he could not, write the epistle in behalf of Lord Grenville.
The question is one of those questions where the evidence of style is
conclusive. It is conceivable the 'A.M. Oxon' letter was well spoken of at
Field Place, that it was written at Mr. Timothy Shelley's instance, that
Medwin was told Shelley wrote it, that Shelley claimed the authorship of
the letter. Establish all these points, produce a copy of the letter in
Shelley's hand-writing; and the evidence of style would be none the less
conclusive, that Shelley did not write the letter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account