The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)Jeaffreson, John Cordy
History
The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Jeaffreson, John Cordy
Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
‘Daniel Hill,’ the town-clerk of Barnstaple wrote to Lord Sidmouth,
when the case had been dealt with in this manner, ‘has been convicted
by the Mayor in ten penalties of 20_l._ each, for publishing and
dispersing Printed Papers, 39 George III. c. 79, and is now committed
to the common gaol of this Borough for not paying the penalties, and
having no goods on which they could be levied.’
When the servant was fined thus heavily, the Mayor and other acting
magistrates assumed that the penalties would be paid by Shelley,--at once
and on the spot, if he had so much money in hand; or in a few days should
it be necessary for him to communicate with his father or lawyer, in order
to put his servant at large. At the trial, Daniel Hill’s defence was that
he had meant no harm in posting the bills in accordance with the
directions of ‘the gentleman,’ who had given him the broadsides for that
purpose, and paid him 2_s._ 6_d._ for the job. Everyone in court, of
course, smiled at the poor fellow’s attempt to make the magistrates
believe, that the ‘gentleman’ was a stranger whom he had come upon
accidentally between Lynton and Barnstaple, and that the day’s work which
had brought him to trouble was a solitary ‘job’ of casual employment; it
being known alike to the Justices on the bench and the public in the body
of the court, that the gentleman, who had set Daniel Hill to disperse the
seditious bills, was Mr. Shelley, the Lynton lodger.
That young Mr. Shelley could not pay so large a fine at a moment’s notice
can have caused the borough magistrates no surprise. That Daniel Hill
should pass a few days under penal discipline, whilst his master should be
getting the money needful for his liberation, was probably desired by the
municipal authorities, to whom it may well have appeared no less salutary
than reasonable that, instead of going from the dock scot-free, he should
endure for a week or so the wholesome rigour of offended justice. But for
a few days, neither to the powers of the bench nor to the multitude living
under their sway, did it appear probable that the servant would remain in
durance for six calendar months, whilst the gentleman who had brought him
to trouble escaped with perfect impunity. In bare justice to all that was
generous in his faulty nature, it should be taken for certain that could
he have paid them, either at once or by drawing money for the purpose from
any source at his command, Shelley would have paid the cumulated fines as
quickly as possible, even though they had amounted to 2000_l._ But he was
no more able to lift Lynton in his palm and pitch it down upon Lynmouth,
than to open the gate of Barnstaple’s common gaol to his Irish varlet.
What could he do for such a purpose? Instead of having 200_l._ at his
command he could not just then have laid his hand on as many shillings,
even though Harriett and Eliza, and the incomparable Portia, had given him
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account