The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)Jeaffreson, John Cordy
History
The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Jeaffreson, John Cordy
Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
Readers no less clearly remember how, just upon a month after the _Eight
Days’ Tour of the Lake_, Shelley and the girls, leaving Byron for just the
same length of time to his own devices, made the _Eight Days’ Trip to
Chamouni_, returning to Mont Alègre and Diodati towards the close of July.
Is it not in the whole world’s memory how, when the rain held them
prisoners in Byron’s villa, the poets and the sisters, in the excitement
of reading ghost stories, terrified one another with ghastly tales of
their own invention;--a tournament of wit and terrifying fancy, that bore
enduring fruit in Mary Godwin’s _Frankenstein_? It is enough to remind
readers of this page how, on the 18th of June, after hearing Byron recite
the _Christabel_ verses on the witch’s breast, Shelley shrieked in horror
at his own vivid imagination of a woman with eyes instead of nipples; and
how in the ensuing August, when Monk Lewis had joined the group at
Diodati, Byron, and Mary, and Shelley, and Claire, drew about the
terrifying relater and beset him with their intensely excited faces,
whilst he poured forth strange stories of hideous fancy and grim humour.
That Shelley had no intention in the middle of July of returning to
England straight from Switzerland, but was possessed by a project of
descending the Danube in a boat, visiting Constantinople and Athens, Rome
and the Tuscan cities, and returning by Southern France, appears from a
letter he wrote from Geneva to Peacock on 17th July, 1816, in the interval
between the _Tour of the Lake_ and the _Trip to Chamouni_,--a letter
containing this remarkable passage,--‘On the motives and consequences of
this journey, I reserve much explanation for some future winter walk or
summer expedition!’ How about these words, that refer _not_ to the
‘Eastern scheme which has just seized on our imaginations,’ _but_ to the
trip from London to Geneva?
Had he believed himself to have told the truth at Bishopgate, in
intimating that he was about to leave England in order to escape his
father and uncle, he would have seen neither need nor occasion for saying
more about the motives for the journey. May the words be taken as an
admission, that the Bishopgate fictions were fictions, and that Peacock
had still to learn the full and true story of the motives and purpose of
the trip to Geneva?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account