The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)Jeaffreson, John Cordy
History
The Real Shelley. New Views of the Poet's Life. Vol. 2 (of 2)
Jeaffreson, John Cordy
Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Shelley, Percy Bysshe, 1792-1822
Whilst living in retirement from circles which had shown a reluctance to
make his acquaintance, the recluse of Diodati--ever, in his morbid
egotism, no less eager for the gossip that lashed him to fury, than for
the gossip that tickled his self-love--was kept _au courant_ with the talk
of the Genevese tables, by persons who had no difficulty in gathering it.
What with Polidori (acceptable in _salons_, where his employer would not
have been welcome), Hentsch the banker (cognizant of everything that went
on in Geneva), Madame de Staël at Coppet (overflowing with almost maternal
solicitude for Lady Noel’s naughty son-in-law), and Fletcher (cleverest of
valets at gathering the gossip of couriers and lady’s-maids, and ever
privileged to pour it with more than a valet’s freedom into his master’s
ear), Byron was in no want of sure informants about Geneva’s opinions of
himself and his doings. And what he learnt of the current talk about his
affairs, the exile from Newstead passed over to his brother in poetry and
domestic trouble. As soon as Shelley and the girls had left for England,
Byron was no less communicative to the friend, who, on coming to the
Château Diodati (a week or so after the departure of the trio), had not
been many hours in the villa, without hearing all about the scandal, that
was largely influential in determining Byron to break with Claire. So
early as 9th September, 1816, the recipient of Byron’s piquant chatter
wrote to the Hon. Mrs. Leigh, of the Genevese curiosity and gossip about
her brother: ‘There was, indeed, until a fortnight ago, a neighbouring
gentleman who had two ladies living in his house under the Château
Diodati, and, as you may suppose, _both and each of these womankind_, as
Mr. Oldbuck calls them in the _Antiquary_, were most literally assigned to
the person who was accustomed to consider the cases of such kind of
appurtenances, when superfluous or neglected by their lawful owners.’
It may be assumed that, in alluding thus lightly to one-half of the
current scandal, the tattler plied his pen (not only in Byron’s interest,
but also with the poet’s sanction), in order to anticipate rumour, with an
explanation of the report, which would be sure to come to his
correspondent’s ears sooner or later.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account