The reconstruction convention met on December 9, 1867, and continued in
session (excepting a recess from December 24 to January 7), until March
11, 1868. The first article of the new constitution on which the
convention took action was reported on January 9.[278] Before that time
many resolutions and ordinances were introduced. Most of them related to
"relief" (such as suspension of tax collections, homestead exemption, stay
of execution for debt, etc.), or to the pay and mileage of delegates, and
only rarely was anything said about the constitution. On December 16 the
more conscientious members secured the appointment of a committee to
inquire whether the convention had power to do any business besides frame
a constitution.[279] This committee did not discuss the law of the
question, but recommended on moral grounds a resolution to this effect:
That all ordinances or other matter ... already introduced and
pending are hereby indefinitely postponed; and in future no ordinance
or other matter ... not necessarily connected with the fundamental
law shall be entertained by this convention [except relief
legislation].
This report met with vigorous opposition. It was saved from the table by
two votes. But it was adopted.[280] The contemporary Conservative press
describes the convention as very infamous and very disgusting.[281] It
contained thirty-three negroes, and the transactions recorded in the
official journal show that it was composed largely of men of low
character.
Hence, to many of the delegates, framing the constitution was only a minor
incident of the convention, and the main part of that work was left to a
small number of men. Their work shows intelligence and ability. Moreover,
in the records of the convention there are not wanting traces of that
undoubted public spirit which animated many of the supporters of
reconstruction--the honest desire to repair and develop the material
welfare of the state. This spirit is evident in the speeches we have
cited, and in some of the resolutions.
We have stated how the campaign of 1868 resulted in giving the
governorship to the Republicans and a majority of twenty-nine in the
legislature to the Conservatives; how Governor Bullock tried to reduce
that majority through Meade, and how Meade refused his aid; and how the
majority was more than doubled by the expulsion of the negroes and the
seating of the minority candidates. From that time to the reorganization
of the legislature in 1870, the most remarkable fact in the state politics
was the hostility between the governor and the legislature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account