Zborowski, ardent advocates of the Reformation after 1550.
Nor were the incomes of the clergy to escape the Polish nobility’s
attack. Whenever the country was in financial straits, the nobility
in a general diet assembled voted special taxes to meet special
emergencies. The clergy, however, were not liable to these special
taxes voted by the diets. They claimed exemption from them. Yet they
did come forward in each emergency with a voluntary contribution, known
as “subsidium charitativum.” This was based on a general estimate of
the clergy’s general income. As this estimate usually constituted
only one-third and frequently one-eighth of the real income of the
clergy, their voluntary contributions based on such estimates were
obviously far below their ability to pay. Manifestly this was unfair
and unjust to the nobility. It, therefore, demanded that the clergy
pay a contribution based on an evaluation of their specific sources
of revenue, such as their estates, their tithes, and other sources of
income.[426]
To this demand of the nobility the clergy were most decidedly opposed.
At the same time they were not a little apprehensive that it might
result in consequences unfavorable to them. To safeguard themselves,
they voted a liberal contribution of 40,000 florins in 1511 for the
purpose of redemption of certain royal lands in Red Russia; and in
exchange for this contribution they exacted from the king a solemn
pledge that henceforth they would be free from military obligations and
from all other burdens, with the exception of the customary subsidium
charitativum, based on an evaluation of their general income, in cases
of a pospolite ruszenie. A written document confirming the pledge of
1511 was issued to the clergy by the king, December 10, 1515.[427] This
furnished the clergy a certain legal basis for their opposition to the
nobility’s demands. When, therefore, the Diets of 1525 and 1527 imposed
a tax on the specific sources of the clergy’s income, the clergy at
their Synod of Łęczyce in 1527, owing to a threatening Tartar invasion,
again voted a voluntary contribution to the country’s needs, but flatly
refused to be taxed by the diets.[428]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account