[417] “Visum est, ut si probatum fuerit Scultetos spiritualium teneri ad expeditionem bellicam, Sculteti eorum sint obligati deinceps Nobiscum in bellum proficisci: praeter eos qui privilegiis essent ab expeditione exempti et liberati; quae privilegia, domini spirituales, in Synodo proximo, postquam praeterita, propter mortem Domini Archiepiscopi effectum sortita non est, se recensere promiserunt, et illa post modum in Conventu Generali Regni, proxime post Synodum futuro exhibebunt; ut ex illis fiat cognitio de immunitate Scultetorum seu Advocatorum; vel obligatione ad praestandam et sustinendam bellicam expeditionem” (Vol. leg. vol. i, fol. 532). [418] See above, p. 60, cf. Vol. leg., vol. ii, fol. 623, par. 56. [419] Acta Tom., vol. v, p. 128, cited by Dr. Pociecha in Reformation of Poland, vol. ii, No. 7, p. 174. [420] Reformation in Poland, vol. ii, No. 7, p. 174. [421] Vol. leg., vol. ii, fol. 623, par. 55. [422] See ibid.; above, p. 60. [423] Reformation in Poland, vol. ii, No. 7, p. 176. [424] See above, p. 98; Reformation in Poland, pp. 174-175. [425] Zakrzewski, pp. 237-238. [426] Reformation in Poland, vol. ii, No. 7, pp. 176-177. [427] Balzar, Corpus juris, vol. iii, No. 181; see also Reformation in Poland, vol. ii, No. 7, p. 177. [428] Reformation in Poland, vol. ii, No. 7, p. 177. [429] Ibid., p. 179; Acta Tom., vol. xii, p. 402, as cited by Dr. Pociecha. [430] See Kutrzeba, p. 83. [431] Smoleński, p. 76; Caro, vol. iv, pp. 85-89. [432] Sokołowski, vol. i, p. 295. [433] Vol. leg. vol. i, fols. 95-104; Caro, vol. iv, p. 40. [434] See Caro, vol. iv, pp. 115, 116. [435] Krasiński, vol. i, p. 52. [436] Caro, vol. iv, p. 115; Smoleński, p. 81. [437] Kakrzewski, pp. 64, 243. [438] Vol. leg., vol. i, folios 85-86; folios 194-195; “Ex quo etiam,” etc. [439] Kubala, p. 22. [440] Smoleński, p. 76. [441] “Praeterea volumus quod laici deinceps pro debitis et in aliis causis civilibus per clericos, ad forum ecclesiasticum non trahantur, nisi forte sit causa spiritualis, vel spirituali annexa, aut debitum fuerit decimale” (Vol. leg., vol. i, fol. 102). [442] Caro, vol. iv, pp. 310-311. [443] Ibid., p 311. [444] Vol. leg., vol. i, fol. 277, “De inhibitionibus ecclesiasticis ad judicia.” [445] “… quapropter decernimus et statuimus, quod judices spirituales saecularia judicia non exerceant neque judicent in futurum” (Vol. leg., vol. i, fol. 304). [446] Ibid., vol. i, fol. 506, “Prospicientes,” etc. [447] Ibid., vol. i, folios 578-581, “Differentias judiciorum,” etc.