Still another method of increasing the demesne estates of the lords was
by incorporating into the demesne estate temporarily vacant peasant
leaseholds. This practice became very common after the middle of the
fifteenth century. Owing to the depreciation of money values and the
rise of prices, especially for agricultural products, lands leased to
peasants at a certain fixed money rental were not very profitable. The
lands of the manorial estate cultivated by the lord directly by forced
labor were yielding far more alluring returns. Hence, it came about
that whenever a peasant left his lot, the lord of the manor, instead of
settling it by leasing it out to another peasant family, simply annexed
it to his seigniorial reserve and cultivated it by forced labor. This
practice proved so profitable that the lords began gradually to resort
to all sorts of oppressive methods for the purpose of driving the
tenant peasants away from their leaseholds, so that they could then
declare the deserted leaseholds as vacant, and annex them to their
demesne estates. There were also instances of unceremonious transfers
of peasant families to the manors and of straightforward seizures of
their leaseholds. This was frequently done in case a peasant’s house
burned down. Instead of rebuilding it, the lord preferred to show his
hospitality by transfering the peasant’s family to the manor, where
they became his servants.[379] The incorporation of deserted peasant
lots into the lord’s private domain was especially tempting inasmuch as
such “deserted” or “vacant” peasant lots were free from the “poradlne”
or “łanowe,” a tax of two “grosze” paid by the nobility into the royal
treasury.[380]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account