When it became evident that the king did not intend to carry out the
wishes of the Diet of 1535, the szlachta of Great Poland instructed its
deputies to the Diet of 1536-1537 to insist on “the execution of laws,”
which included the matter of the church’s privileges. At this Diet the
Chamber of Deputies raised, therefore, most violent protests against
the abuses described, and vigorously demanded conformity to law and
restoration of all illegally acquired benefices and church property.
At the same time the Chamber demanded that henceforth the king appoint
to abbacies and other lucrative church benefices only native Poles of
noble birth, or plebeians of Polish nationality in the event that there
are not enough candidates of noble birth to fill vacancies. The leaders
in this movement were Raphael Leszczyński, Stanislaus Myszkowski,
Nicholas Krzycki, and John Sierakowski, who later on became well-known
champions of the Reformation movement.[392] Moreover, in 1538 the Diet
passed a law, according to which anyone receiving anything contrary
to statutory enactments by courting the favor of the Vatican was
thereby ipso facto proscribed and his possessions were confiscated. By
the same law all church dignitaries residing in Rome away from their
appointments were recalled, and if they failed to return to the country
within a specified time, they were to be deprived of their offices and
banished, and were not to be permitted to enter the country.[393]
But high ecclesiastical offices richly endowed were after all limited
in number. If the Polish nobility was to find larger access to the
landed property of the church, it had to get to it in other ways,
which it did. If the secular nobles were keen in buying up village
mayorships, so were the Polish clergy. In fact, they were in possession
of more mayorships than the secular nobles.[394] Then, too, their
landed estates were further augmented by bequests of pious persons.
These things were a thorn in the flesh to the Polish nobility. It
sought ways and means of preventing this constant increase of church
property. As early as 1510 testamentary bequests of real estate
property to the church were prohibited by statutory enactment.[395] In
1534 the szlachta at its provincial diets unanimously demanded that the
General Diet restrain the clergy from buying up village mayorships,
with the result that in the end a law was enacted prohibiting all
transfers of estates with nobility rights and privileges to the
clergy whether by gift, sale, or any other method.[396] The stormy
Diet of 1536-1537 went still further, demanding the secularization
of all ecclesiastical estates and the sale to the szlachta of all
the newly acquired lands of the clergy.[397] Nor did the nobles stop
at mere demands and legislative enactments; occasionally they took
matters directly into their hands. For instance, whenever and wherever
there was an opportunity to seize the land of a parish priest or a
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account