According to a statute of Casimir the Great of the year 1347 the mayors
of ecclesiastical villages as well as the mayors of secular villages
were required to participate in military expeditions.[413] This
obligation was reaffirmed by the Constitution of 1538,[414] and again
in 1550.[415] But, as we have already noted, the clergy succeeded in
evading these statutory provisions not only throughout the fifteenth,
but also in the sixteenth century. It is not strange, therefore,
to find that as the burden of defense was increasing in weight the
Polish nobility repeatedly demanded that the mayors of ecclesiastical
villages take part in the country’s defense in compliance with the
law. The first demand of this nature in the sixteenth century was made
as early as 1510; then we find it repeated at the Diet of 1536-1537;
and again in 1563. In 1510 the king referred the question at issue
to the provincial synod for review, and the synod was to report on
it at a subsequent general diet.[416] But the matter was evidently
laid aside and remained so as long as it was possible to keep it from
coming to the front again; for when it was brought up at the Diet
of 1536-1537, it was again treated in a similar manner. The bishops
agreed to comply with the law, provided it was proved to them that
the mayors of their villages were subject to military service. Their
special privileges, which they claimed to possess, were to be examined
at the following synod, and then the matter was to be reported on at
the general diet.[417] Presumably the matter stopped there as before;
for at the Diet of 1558-1559 the Chamber of Deputies raised the old
question again, and demanded of the bishops the presentation of their
special privileges exempting the mayors of ecclesiastical villages
from military service. But even then the clergy did not produce this
documentary evidence until at the Diet of 1563; and when actually
produced, it was found wanting, owing to its indefiniteness.[418]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account