Nationalists -- Philippines -- Fiction; Philippine fiction (Spanish) -- Translations into English; Philippines -- History -- Fiction
How the good man labored, the most active of all the arbiters in the
world! He wished to get out of the predicament by pleasing
everybody—the friars, the high official, the Countess, Padre Irene, and
his own liberal principles. He had consulted with Señor Pasta, and
Señor Pasta had left him stupefied and confused, after advising him to
do a million contradictory and impossible things. He had consulted with
Pepay the dancing girl, and Pepay, who had no idea what he was talking
about, executed a pirouette and asked him for twenty-five pesos to bury
an aunt of hers who had suddenly died for the fifth time, or the fifth
aunt who had suddenly died, according to fuller explanations, at the
same time requesting that he get a cousin of hers who could read,
write, and play the violin, a job as assistant on the public works—all
things that were far from inspiring Don Custodio with any saving idea.
Two days after the events in the Quiapo fair, Don Custodio was as usual
busily studying the petition, without hitting upon the happy solution.
While he yawns, coughs, smokes, and thinks about Pepay’s legs and her
pirouettes, let us give some account of this exalted personage, in
order to understand Padre Sibyla’s reason for proposing him as the
arbiter of such a vexatious matter and why the other clique accepted
him.
Don Custodio de Salazar y Sanchez de Monteredondo, often referred to as
Good Authority, belonged to that class of Manila society which cannot
take a step without having the newspapers heap titles upon them,
calling each indedefatigable, distinguished, zealous, active, profound,
intelligent, well-informed, influential, and so on, as if they feared
that he might be confused with some idle and ignorant possessor of the
same name. Besides, no harm resulted from it, and the watchful censor
was not disturbed. The Good Authority resulted from his friendship with
Ben-Zayb, when the latter, in his two noisiest controversies, which he
carried on for weeks and months in the columns of the newspapers about
whether it was proper to wear a high hat, a derby, or a salakot, and
whether the plural of carácter should be carácteres or caractéres, in
order to strengthen his argument always came out with, “We have this on
good authority,” “We learn this from good authority,” later letting it
be known, for in Manila everything becomes known, that this Good
Authority was no other than Don Custodio de Salazar y Sanchez de
Monteredondo.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account