Great Britain -- History -- Mary I, 1553-1558; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
A fortnight after (May 25), he wrote again, replying more elaborately
to the emperor's charges. It was true, he admitted, that in his
letters to the queen he had dwelt more upon her religious duties than
upon her marriage: it was true that he had been backward in his
demonstrations of pleasure, because he was a person of few words. But,
so far from disapproving of that marriage, he looked upon it as the
distinct work of God; {p.149} and when his nephew had come with
complaints to him, he had forbidden him his presence. He had spoken of
the rule of a stranger in England as likely to be a lesson to the
people; but he had meant only that, as their disasters had befallen
them through their own king Henry, their deliverance would be wrought
for them by one who was not their own. When the late parliament had
broken up without consenting to the restoration of union, he had
consoled the queen with assuring her that he saw in it the hand of
Providence; the breach of a marriage between an English king and a
Spanish princess had caused the wound which a renewed marriage of a
Spanish king and an English queen was to heal.[350]
[Footnote 350: Scrissi alla Regina non la volendo
contristare condolermi di cio, che lo interpretava
et intendeva che questa tardita non venisse tanto
da lei quanto delle Providentia di Dio, il qual
habbia ordinato che si come per discordia
matrimoniale d'un Re Inglese et d'una Regina
Hispana fu levata l'obedientia della chiesa de quel
Regno cosi dalla concordia matrimoniale d'un Re
Hispano et d'una Regina Inglese ella vi doverse
ritornare.--Pole to Morone: _Epist._ Reg. Pol. vol.
iv.]
The defence was elaborate, and, on the whole, may have been tolerably
true. The pope would not take the trouble to read it, or even to hear
it read;[351] but the substance, as related to him by Morone,
convinced him that the emperor's accusations were exaggerated: to
recall a legate at the instance of a secular sovereign was an
undesirable precedent;[352] and the commission was allowed to stand.
Julius wrote to Charles, assuring him that he was mistaken in the
legate's feelings, leaving the emperor at the same time, however, full
power to keep him in Flanders or to send him to England at his own
discretion.
[Footnote 351: E benche S. Sanctita non havesse
patienza secundo l'ordinario suo di leggere o di
udir la lettera, nondimeno le dissi talmente la
summa che nostro restare satisfattissima, e disse
esser piu che certa che quella non haveva dato
causa ne all' Imperatore ne ad altri d'usar con lei
termini cosi extravaganti.--Morone to Pole:
Burnet's _Collectanea_.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account