The Relations of Science and Religion: The Morse Lecture, 1880Calderwood, Henry
Religion
The Relations of Science and Religion: The Morse Lecture, 1880
Calderwood, Henry
Religion and science
their history yields powerful indirect evidence in support of the
position that origin of life apart from germ is unknown.
It is, however, desirable here, in order to give completeness to our
view of the present situation, to remark that among scientific men there
are some who have no expectation of a scientific explanation of the
origin of life; while others are exceedingly hopeful that such
explanation may be reached, in the latter class appearing naturally all
those who openly proclaim against what they name an "incomprehensible
act of creation," and voluntarily place themselves in antagonism to
religious thought. It is, therefore, of some consequence to indicate the
grounds on which such opposite views rest. On the one side, Professor
Tait, while suggesting the possibility of yet discovering the physical
principles which determine life, nevertheless adds, "Let no one imagine
that, should we ever penetrate this mystery, we shall thereby be enabled
to produce, except from life, even the lowest form of life."[AQ] On the
other hand Professor Schmidt of Strasburg maintains the opposite view,
affirming that "the investigation of nature does not shrink from
enrolling _life_, and the processes of life in the world of the
comprehensible."[AR] This latter assertion is not to be accounted for on
the ground that Schmidt is the ardent admirer and defender of the theory
of origin of species by natural selection, for it is clear, as he
maintains in replying to Max Müller, that "the origin of life has in
fact nothing to do with actual Darwinism, or natural selection, unless
the principle of selection be extended to the inorganic world of
matter."[AS] Mr. Darwin himself does not suggest any such extension, and
his theory of species is not chargeable with it. It should, indeed, be
clearly recognized on all hands that the naturalist confines himself to
a narrower range of inquiry, taking existing phases of life as the
subject of his study. Accordingly, whoever claims that the origin of
life comes within the compass of science, does so on the ground that
there is no demarcation between the organic and the inorganic,--that the
former may arise directly from the latter,--and so he commits himself to
a doctrine of descent world-wide in its application, involving
development in the world of all its varied phases of existence from a
mass of unorganized matter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account