The Relations of Science and Religion: The Morse Lecture, 1880Calderwood, Henry
Religion
The Relations of Science and Religion: The Morse Lecture, 1880
Calderwood, Henry
Religion and science
reached."[CQ] This is exactly similar to the manner in which some
monkeys are known to construct a natural bridge, only that the monkeys
have the advantage of greater size and muscular strength, as well as
prehensile power by the use of their tails. With such characteristics as
have been briefly described, there is little wonder that a high place in
the scale of intelligence has been claimed for these small insects. Sir
John Lubbock, who has so patiently conducted his observations as to
their modes of life, has stated this in the following manner,--"The
anthropoid apes no doubt approach more to man in bodily structure than
do any other animals; but when we consider the habits of ants, their
social organization, their large communities, elaborate habitations,
their roadways, their possession of domestic animals, and even in some
cases of slaves, it must be admitted that they have a fair claim to rank
next to man in the scale of intelligence."[CR] Whether, even with all
this evidence, we may be able to rank the ants quite as high as Lubbock
here suggests, may be open to question. There may, for example, be
reasonable debate whether the dog does not present still higher signs of
intelligence, but it says a great deal for the ants that debate in the
case should be possible. A question of very great scientific importance
is here raised, affecting the whole scheme of interpretation applicable
to animal life, as connected with development of brain.
Without attempting to enter upon the argument yet to be conducted
through the wider relations concerned, it must be obvious that the facts
bearing on insect life must erelong have a larger share than they have
yet had in influencing our generalizations. By reference to these, it
becomes apparent, that anatomical structure is not in itself an adequate
guide in determining comparative importance on the scale of organic
existence; and, what is still more startling, that even comparative
brain structure can not be taken as the sole test of the measure of
intelligence belonging to animals. The whole orders of ants, taken
collectively, must be regarded as presenting quite exceptional
difficulties, not only for a theory of evolution regarded as an
all-embracing science of life; but also for that theory of intelligence
which seeks to account for diversities of power by the comparative
complexity of brain structure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account