The Religio-Medical Masquerade: A Complete Exposure of Christian SciencePeabody, Frederick William
Religion
The Religio-Medical Masquerade: A Complete Exposure of Christian Science
Peabody, Frederick William
Christian Science -- Controversial literature
On “the third day,” according to her latest version, she “arose
from the bed of pain, healed and free,” but in a letter dated
February 15, 1866, two weeks after the accident and while she was
still suffering from its effects, she complained that she was
then “slowly failing,” and implored Mr. Julius Dresser, to whom
the letter was written, to help her.
Here is her story of the incident as written at the time:
Lynn, Feb. 15, 1866.
“Mr. Dresser,—
“_Sir:_ I enclose some lines of mine in memory of our
much-loved Friend, which perhaps _you_ will not think
over-wrought in meaning, _others_ must of course.
“I am constantly wishing that _you_ would step forward into the
place he has vacated. I believe you would do a vast amount of
good, and are more capable of occupying his place than any
other I know of.
“Two weeks ago I fell on the sidewalk and struck my back on the
ice and was taken up for dead, came to consciousness amid a
storm of vapors from cologne, chloroform, ether, camphor, etc.,
but to find myself the helpless cripple I was before I saw Dr.
Quimby.
“The physician attending said I had taken the last step I ever
should, but in two days I got out of my bed _alone_, and _will_
walk, but yet I confess I am frightened, and out of that
nervous heat my friends are forming, spite of me, the terrible
spinal affection from which I have suffered so long and
hopelessly.… Now can’t _you_ help me. I believe you can. I
write this with this feeling: I think I could help another in
_my_ condition, if they had not placed their intelligence in
matter. This I have not done and yet _I am slowly failing_.
Won’t you write me if you will undertake for me if I can get to
you?…
“Respectfully,
“Mary M. Patterson.”
Not to comment upon the singularity of the administration of
chloroform and ether to an unconscious person, it sufficeth to
call attention to the manner in which again Mrs. Patterson
contradicts Mrs. Eddy. She furnishes the most effective kind of
corroboration of Dr. Cushing, and the whole thing is clearly seen
to be an invention, so far as any unusual or peculiar or
miraculous features are concerned. It is clear that Mrs. Eddy did
not discover Christian Science in the _manner_ claimed.
So much for that particular, and particularly silly perversion of
the truth, and invention of the fictitious.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account